Oracle America, Inc. et al v. Cedarcrestone, Inc

Filing 80

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO SHORTEN TIME 78 . Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery 75 set for 7/24/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Responses due by 7/11/2013. Replies due by 7/16/2013. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 7/9/13. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP
Geoffrey M. Howard (SBN 157468)
[e-mail]
Bree Hann (SBN 215695)
[e-mail]
John Polito (SBN 253195)
[e-mail]
Chad Russell (SBN 246046)
[e-mail]
Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, CA 94111-4067
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.393.2286

ORACLE CORPORATION
Deborah K. Miller (SBN 95527)
[e-mail]
Jennifer Gloss (SBN 154227)
[e-mail]
500 Oracle Parkway
M/S 5op7
Redwood City, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650.506.7114

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Oracle America, Inc., and
Oracle International Corporation
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
ORACLE AMERICA, INC., a Delaware
corporation, and ORACLE
INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a
California corporation,
Plaintiffs,
v.

Case No. 3:12-cv-04626 (NC)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SHORTENING TIME TO
RESPOND TO ORACLE’S MOTION FOR
RELIEF FROM CASE MANAGEMENT
SCHEDULING ORDER AND SETTING HEARING

CEDARCRESTONE, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
Defendant.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26

CEDARCRESTONE, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
Counter-claimant,
v.
ORACLE AMERICA, INC., a Delaware
corporation, and ORACLE
INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a
California corporation,
Counter-defendants.

27
28
Case No. 3:12-cv-04626-NC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR RELIEF
FROM CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

1

WHEREAS, on January 17, 2013, the Court entered a Case Management Scheduling

2

Order (Dkt. 32) in this case. See Declaration of Geoffrey M. Howard (“Howard Decl.”) ¶ 2;

3

WHEREAS, plaintiffs Oracle America, Inc. and Oracle International Corporation

4

(collectively, “Oracle”) filed a Motion for Relief from the Case Management Scheduling Order

5

(the “Motion”) on July 5, 2013. See Howard Decl. ¶ 3;

6

WHEREAS, Oracle’s Motion requests a modification of outstanding case deadlines in

7

this action, including the close of fact discovery currently scheduled for August 19, 2013. See

8

Howard Decl. ¶¶ 2-3;

9

WHEREAS, absent an order shortening the motion schedule, Defendant CedarCrestone,

10

Inc.’s (“CedarCrestone”) responsive pleading would not be due until July 19, 2013, Oracle’s

11

reply pleading would not be due until July 26, 2013, and a potential hearing regarding the

12

Motion would be scheduled for no earlier than August 14, 2013. See Howard Decl. ¶¶ 4-6;

13

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND REQUEST THE

14

COURT TO ORDER as follows: that CedarCrestone’s deadline for filing a response to Oracle’s

15

Motion will be July 11, 2013; and that Oracle’s deadline for filing a reply pleading will be July

16

16, 2013. The parties further request that a hearing regarding the Motion, if the Court deems

17

such hearing necessary, be scheduled for the earliest possible date convenient to the Court.

18
19

Dated: July 5, 2013

20

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP
BY:

21

___/s/ Geoffrey M. Howard___________
Geoffrey M. Howard
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Oracle America, Inc. and Oracle
International Corporation

22
23
24
25
26

Dated: July 5, 2013

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
BY:

27

___/s/ Daniel Purcell________________
Daniel Purcell
Attorneys for Defendant
CedarCrestone, Inc.

28
1

Case No. 3:12-cv-04626-NC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR RELIEF
FROM CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING

1
2

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X.B. regarding non-filing signatories, I hereby

3

attest that I have obtained concurrence from counsel for CedarCrestone in the filing of this

4

document.

5

Dated: July 5, 2013.

______/s/ Geoffrey M. Howard_________

6
7
8
9

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

10

The hearing on Oracle's Motion to Complete Discovery is scheduled for July 24, 2013 at 10:00 a.m.

11

DATED: July 9, 2013

RT

16

thanael
Judge Na

ER

18

s

A

H

17

M. Cousin

LI

15

TED

R NIA

S

UNIT
ED

14

GRAN

NO

13

RT
U
O

12

S DISTRICT
Hon. TE
Nathanael M. Cousins
C
TA
United States Magistrate Judge

FO

By:

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

Case No. 3:12-cv-04626-NC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR RELIEF
FROM CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER