Piping Rock Partners, Inc. et al v. David Lerner Associates, Inc. et al

Filing 151

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 7/12/16. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2016)

Download PDF
Jonathan S. Ball (SBN 264107) 1 jb@ball-lawcorp.com BALL LAW CORPORATION 2 One Market/Spear Tower, 36th Floor 3 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 349-0721/Fax: (415) 520-6864 4 Adam B. Wolf (SBN 215914) 5 awolf@prwlegal.com Tracey B. Cowan (SBN 250053) 6 tcowan@prwlegal.com PEIFFER ROSCA WOLF ABDULLAH 7 CARR & KANE, APLC 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1400 8 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-766-3545 Facsimile: 415-402-0058 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 PIPING ROCK PARTNERS, INC. a 15 California corporation, and CHRISTOPHER K. GERMAIN, an individual, 16 Plaintiffs, 17 vs. 18 19 DAVID LERNER ASSOCIATES, INC., a New York corporation, DAVID LERNER, an 20 individual, and DOES 1 to 7 inclusive, 21 Defendants. 22 23 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:12-cv-04634-SI [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL, WITH PREJUDICE Before the Honorable Susan Illston United States District Court Judge 1. Plaintiffs Christopher Germain and Piping Rock Partners, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”), and Defendants 24 25 26 27 George Dobbs and David Lerner Associates, Inc. (“Defendants”) (collectively, the “Parties”), have entered into a settlement agreement and mutual releases and have stipulated to the dismissal of this action, with prejudice. 28 -1[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case No. 3:12-cv-04634-SI 1 2. It is hereby ordered, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, that this action is 2 dismissed with prejudice. Each party to bear its own costs. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 8 July 12 2016 __, 9 By: ________________________________ Hon. Susan Illston United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case No. 3:12-cv-04634-SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?