Rocket Dog Brands, LLC v. GMI Corporation
Filing
31
ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting 30 Stipulation Re: STIPULATION EXTENDING THE TIME TO COMPLETE THE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE TO MAY 22, 2013 (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Sarah E. Barrows (SBN 253278)
J. Blake Cunningham (SBN 261559)
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 655-1300
Facsimile: (415) 707-2010
Email: barrowss@gtlaw.com
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
GMI USA CORP.
GARNER K. WENG, SBN 191462
gweng@hansonbridgett.com
LAWRENCE M. CIRELLI, SBN 114710
lcirelli@hansonbridgett.com
CHRISTOPHERS. WALTERS, SBN 267262
cwalters@hansonbridgett.com
425 Market Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Tel: (415) 777-3200
Fax: (415) 541-9366
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant
Rocket Dog Brands, LLC
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
19
ROCKET DOG BRANDS, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,
20
Plaintiff,
21
v.
22
23
24
GMI CORPORATION, a New York
corporation,
CASE NO. C12-4643 SI
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
THE TIME TO COMPLETE THE
MANDATORY SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE TO MAY 22, 2013
Hon. Judge Susan Y. Illston
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE TIME
TO COMPLETE THE MSC TO MAY 22, 2013
CASE NO. C12-4643 SI
1
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefor,
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline to complete a mandatory settlement
3
conference in Case No. C12-4634-SI, previously set for April 12, 2013, is hereby extended to
4
May 22, 2013.
5
6
3/13/13
Dated: _______________
7
______________________________
Honorable Susan Y. Illston
Judge of the United States District Court,
Northern District of California
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE TIME
TO COMPLETE THE MSC TO MAY 22, 2013
CASE NO. C12-4643 SI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?