Walia v. Boothapuri et al

Filing 91

ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/15/2013. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 GURINDER WALIA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 AEGIS CENTER POINT DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LTD. ET AL. Defendants. 17 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING v. 16 18 No. CV-12-4660-CRB / Defendant Aegis Center Point Developers Private Ltd. (“Aegis”) filed a motion styled as a Motion to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens. See dkt. 49. In substance, however, that motion seeks dismissal of this action on preclusion grounds. Neither side has fully addressed preclusion in their respective briefs. The Court VACATES the hearing currently set for July 19, 2013, and ORDERS Plaintiff and Aegis to submit supplemental briefs raising all arguments that they wish to present regarding whether this action should be dismissed on preclusion grounds. Simultaneous briefs, no longer than eight pages, shall be filed by July 29, 2013 at 5 p.m. Responses to the simultaneous briefs, no longer than four pages, shall be filed by August 5, 2013 at 5 p.m. // // // // 1 2 This matter is reset for hearing on August 30, 2013, at 10 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: July 15, 2013 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 G:\CRBALL\2012\4660\order re supplemental briefing v2.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?