Walia v. Boothapuri et al
Filing
91
ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/15/2013. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
GURINDER WALIA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
AEGIS CENTER POINT DEVELOPERS
PRIVATE LTD. ET AL.
Defendants.
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL
BRIEFING
v.
16
18
No. CV-12-4660-CRB
/
Defendant Aegis Center Point Developers Private Ltd. (“Aegis”) filed a motion styled
as a Motion to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens. See dkt. 49. In substance, however, that
motion seeks dismissal of this action on preclusion grounds. Neither side has fully addressed
preclusion in their respective briefs. The Court VACATES the hearing currently set for July
19, 2013, and ORDERS Plaintiff and Aegis to submit supplemental briefs raising all
arguments that they wish to present regarding whether this action should be dismissed on
preclusion grounds. Simultaneous briefs, no longer than eight pages, shall be filed by July
29, 2013 at 5 p.m. Responses to the simultaneous briefs, no longer than four pages, shall be
filed by August 5, 2013 at 5 p.m.
//
//
//
//
1
2
This matter is reset for hearing on August 30, 2013, at 10 a.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: July 15, 2013
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
G:\CRBALL\2012\4660\order re supplemental briefing v2.wpd
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?