Jimenez v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

Filing 22

STIPULATION AND ORDER Continuing Mediation Deadline. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 01/25/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Christopher R. LeClerc, Esq. (SB# 233479) LE CLERC & LE CLERC LLP 235 Montgomery Street, Suite 1019 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 445-0900 Fax: (415) 445-9977 Email: chris@leclerclaw.com 5 6 7 8 San Francisco, CA 94104 Le Clerc & Le Clerc LLP 10 235 Montgomery Street, Suite 1019 9 14 11 12 Michael J. Sexton, CA Bar No. 153435 michael.sexton@ogletreedeakins.com Jill V. Cartwright, CA Bar No. 260519 jill.cartwright@ogletreedeakins.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. Steuart Tower, Suite 1300 One Market Plaza San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415.442.4810 Facsimile: 415.442.4870 Stephen Danz (SB# 68318) STEPHEN DANZ & ASSOCIATES 11661 San Vicente Blvd., Suite 500 Los Angeles, CA 90049 Telephone: (877) 789-9707 Fax: (310) 207-5006 Email: stephen.danz@employmentattorneyca.com Attorneys for Plaintiff VICTOR JIMENEZ Attorneys for Defendant HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 18 VICTOR JIMENEZ, an individual, 19 20 21 Plaintiff, v. 22 HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.; and DOES 1-100, inclusive, 23 Defendants. 24 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C 12-cv-04686 TEH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MEDIATION DEADLINE Action Filed: October 8, 2010 Trial Date: None Set 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MEDIATION DEADLINE JIMENEZ V. HOME DEPOT U.S.A.,INC. , ET AL. (CASE NO. C 12-04686 TEH) 1 RECITALS 2 Whereas, the parties entered into a stipulation to mediation this matter through the 3 4 5 6 7 8 Northern District's mediation program on November 20, 2012. Whereas, the presumptive deadline for this mediation to occur is 90 days after the date of that Order, which is February 18, 2013. Whereas, to facilitate discovery important to resolving the underlying dispute and in light of the calendars of counsel and the mediator, Mr. F. Curt Kirschner, the parties have agreed to San Francisco, CA 94104 Le Clerc & Le Clerc LLP Whereas, the Court entered an Order on the parties' stipulation referring the case into the 10 235 Montgomery Street, Suite 1019 9 Northern District of California's alternative dispute resolution program. 14 Court enter an order continuing the deadline for the mediation in this matter to occur until on or 15 after April 2, 2013. mediate this dispute on April 2, 2013, provided that the Court grants this extension to the 11 deadline. 12 13 16 STIPULATION In light of the foregoing, the parties by and through counsel, hereby stipulate that the Dated: January 24, 2013 Le Clerc & Le Clerc LLP 17 By: /s/ Christopher R. LeClerc Christopher R. LeClerc, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff Victor Jimenez 18 19 20 Dated: January 24, 2013 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 21 By: /s/ Jill Cartwright Michael Sexton Jill Cartwright Attorney for Defendant Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MEDIATION DEADLINE JIMENEZ V. HOME DEPOT U.S.A.,INC. , ET AL. (CASE NO. C 12-04686 TEH) 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Having reviewed the recitals and the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, 3 it is hereby ORDERED that the mediation deadline in this matter be extended until April 2, 4 2013. 6 1/25 Dated: _______________, 2013 NO 11 A San Francisco, CA 94104 14 ER H Le Clerc & Le Clerc LLP 10 235 Montgomery Street, Suite 1019 Judge T RT 9 FO Hon. Thelton E. Henderson Judge for the Federal DistrictoCourt rs n Northern District n ECalifornia of . Hende helto 8 LI 7 R NIA UNIT ED S IT IS SO ORDERED. RT U O 5 S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R C 12 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MEDIATION DEADLINE JIMENEZ V. HOME DEPOT U.S.A.,INC. , ET AL. (CASE NO. C 12-04686 TEH)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?