Jimenez v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

Filing 30

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 08/19/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Christopher R. LeClerc, CA Bar No. 233479
[e-mail]
LE CLERC & LE CLERC, LLP
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 1019
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
415.445.0900
Facsimile:
415.445.9977
Stephen Danz, CA Bar No. 68318
[e-mail]
STEPHEN DANZ & ASSOCIATES
11661 San Vicente Blvd, Suite 500
Los Angeles, CA 90049
Telephone:
877.789.9709
Facsimile:
310.207.5006
Attorneys for Plaintiff
VICTOR JIMENEZ
Michael J. Sexton, CA Bar No. 153435
[e-mail]
Jill V. Cartwright, CA Bar No. 260519
[e-mail]
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
Steuart Tower, Suite 1300
One Market Plaza
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
415.442.4810
Facsimile:
415.442.4870
Attorneys for Defendant
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.

18
19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

20

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

21

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

22

VICTOR JIMENEZ, an Individual,
Plaintiff,

23
24
25
26

vs.

Case No. C 12 4686 TEH
STIPULATION TO DISMISS PURSUANT
TO FRCP 41(A)(1)

HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.; and DOES 1-100,
inclusive,
Defendant.

Action Filed:
Trial Date:

July 27, 2012
December 3, 2013

27
28
Case No. C 12 4686 TEH

STIPULATION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(A)(1)

1

STIPULATION

2

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their

3

designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice

4

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1).

5
6

DATED: August 16, 2013

LE CLERC & LE CLERC, LLP

7
By:

8
9

/s/ Christopher LeClerc
Christopher R. LeClerc
Stephen Danz

Attorneys for Plaintiff
VICTOR JIMENEZ

10
11
12 DATED: August 16, 2013

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.

13
By:

14
15

/s/ Jill V. Cartwright
Michael J. Sexton
Jill V. Cartwright

Attorneys for Defendant
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.

16
17
18

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

19
20

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this

21

document has been obtained from the other signatories.

22

DATED: August 16, 2013

23

By:

/s/ Jill Cartwright
Jill V. Cartwright

24
25
26
27
28
1
Case No. C 12 4686 TEH
STIPULATION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(A)(1)

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1

5
DATED:

08/19/2013

Hon. Thelton E. Henderson
United States District Judge

H

ER

LI

9

son

Hender

Ju

RT

8

lton E.
dge The

10

FO

NO

7

A

6

R NIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

4

cause appearing, this action is dismissed with prejudice.

S

3

The Court having read and considered the foregoing request and stipulation, and with good

UNIT
ED

2

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

11
12

15706543.1

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. C 12 4686 TEH
STIPULATION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(A)(1)