Covington v. Department of Social Services
Filing
52
ORDER REQUESTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING. Signed by Judge Alsup on 4/29/2014. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2014).
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
SANDRA COVINGTON,
Plaintiff,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
No. C 12-04688 WHA
v.
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES,
ORDER REQUESTING
SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING
Defendant.
/
14
15
Defendant Department of Social Services has filed a motion for summary judgment, set
16
for hearing on May 8, 2014. In connection with that motion, the undersigned judge is aware that
17
certain claims in the amended complaint are brought under California’s Fair Employment and
18
Housing Act (i.e., unlawful race discrimination, hostile work environment harassment, and
19
retaliation). Of note, the Department appears to be a California state agency, and has raised the
20
affirmative defense of sovereign immunity in its answer (Dkt. No. 25 at 7).
21
Our court of appeals has held that “the Eleventh Amendment bars [a plaintiff’s] FEHA
22
claim in federal court” against a state agency. Freeman v. Oakland Unified Sch. Dist., 179 F.3d
23
846, 847–48 (9th Cir. 1999); see also Burks v. California Highway Patrol, 2 F. App’x 887, 888
24
(9th Cir. 2001). Accordingly, counsel are requested to please file supplemental briefing, no
25
longer than THREE PAGES PER SIDE, to address the effect of Freeman on plaintiff’s FEHA
26
claims here. This supplemental briefing is due no later than 12 PM ON MAY 2, 2014.
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 29, 2014.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?