Rushing v. Stericycle, Inc.
Filing
23
ORDER granting 22 STIPULATION Continuing the Initial Case Management Conference to January 18, 2013 at 8:30 a.m. filed by Stericycle, Inc. Case Management Statement due by 1/11/2013. Initial Case Management Conference reset for 1/18/2013 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/4/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2013)
Case3:12-cv-04692-CRB Document22 Filed01/03/13 Page1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
BETH W. MORA, State Bar No. 208859
ELENA N. Liveris, State Bar No. 262973
COOPER & MORA, PC
18 Crow Canyon Court, Suite 145
San Ramon, CA 94583
Tel: (925) 820-8949
Fax: (925) 820-0278
Counsel for Plaintiff:
LIZA RUSHING
6
7
8
JACQUELINE DESOUZA, State Bar No. 133686
DESOUZA LAW OFFICES, a professional corporation
1615 Hopkins Street
Berkeley, CA 94707
Tel/Fax: (510) 649-3420
9
10
11
12
STEVEN HAMANN (appearing pro hac vice)
SCOT HINSHAW (appearing pro hac vice)
VEDDER PRICE P.C.
222 North LaSalle Street, Suite 2600
Chicago, IL 60601-1003
Telephone: (312) 609-7500
Facsimile: (312) 609-5005
13
14
Counsel for Defendant(s):
STERICYCLE, INC.
15
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
LIZA RUSHING,
Plaintiff,
19
20
21
22
23
Case No. CV 12-04692 CRB
vs.
STERICYCLE, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
and Does 1-50,
STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES
CONTINUING THE INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERNCE TO
JANUARY 18, 2013, at 8:30 a.m.; and,
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Defendants.
24
____________________________________/
25
The Parties by and through their attorneys of record stipulate as follows:
26
27
(1) Due to a scheduling conflict that arose the week of January 2nd, counsel for Defendant
Stericycle, Inc is unable to attend the Initial Case Management Conference presently scheduled
28
1
STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES CONTINUING THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERNCE TO JANUARY 18, 2013, at 8:30 a.m.;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Case3:12-cv-04692-CRB Document22 Filed01/03/13 Page2 of 3
1
for January 11, 2013. The Parties have conferred and stipulate to continue the Initial Case
2
Management Conference to January 18, 2013, at 8:30 a.m. The Parties cleared this date with
3
the Court prior to submitting this Stipulation.
4
(2) The Parties have conferred, completed and filed their Joint Case Management Conference
5
Statement in compliance with the Court’s Order Setting Case Management Conference.
6
(3) This brief continuance is necessary to comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 26(f)
7
and Civil Local Rule 16-10(a) and is not being made for any improper purpose such as to cause
8
delay in the proceedings or to gain a tactical advantage.
9
10
Dated: January 3, 2013
COOPER & MORA, PC
11
By: __/s/ Beth W. Mora______________
Beth W. Mora
Counsel for Plaintiff, LIZA RUSHING
12
13
14
Dated: January 3, 2013
VEDDER PRICE, PC
15
By: __/s/ Steven Hamann______________
Steven Hamann
Counsel for Defendant STERICYCLE, INC.
16
17
18
Dated: January 3, 2013
DESOUZA LAW OFFICES
a professional corporation
19
20
By: __/s/ Jacqueline deSouza______________
Jacqueline deSouza
Counsel for Defendant STERICYCLE, INC.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES CONTINUING THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERNCE TO JANUARY 18, 2013, at 8:30 a.m.;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Case3:12-cv-04692-CRB Document22 Filed01/03/13 Page3 of 3
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
Good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS as follows:
3
The Initial Case Management Conference in the matter Liza Rushing v. Stericycle, Inc., case no.: CV
4
12-04692 CRB is continued from January 11, 2013, to January 18, 2013, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 6,
5
17th Floor 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA.
6
J
ER
H
13
RT
12
R NIA
. Breyer
arles R
udge Ch
NO
11
14
FO
10
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
A
9
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
LI
4
Dated: January ___, 2013
UNIT
ED
8
S
IT IS SO ORDERED.
RT
U
O
7
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES CONTINUING THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERNCE TO JANUARY 18, 2013, at 8:30 a.m.;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?