Rushing v. Stericycle, Inc.

Filing 23

ORDER granting 22 STIPULATION Continuing the Initial Case Management Conference to January 18, 2013 at 8:30 a.m. filed by Stericycle, Inc. Case Management Statement due by 1/11/2013. Initial Case Management Conference reset for 1/18/2013 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/4/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2013)

Download PDF
Case3:12-cv-04692-CRB Document22 Filed01/03/13 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 BETH W. MORA, State Bar No. 208859 ELENA N. Liveris, State Bar No. 262973 COOPER & MORA, PC 18 Crow Canyon Court, Suite 145 San Ramon, CA 94583 Tel: (925) 820-8949 Fax: (925) 820-0278 Counsel for Plaintiff: LIZA RUSHING 6 7 8 JACQUELINE DESOUZA, State Bar No. 133686 DESOUZA LAW OFFICES, a professional corporation 1615 Hopkins Street Berkeley, CA 94707 Tel/Fax: (510) 649-3420 9 10 11 12 STEVEN HAMANN (appearing pro hac vice) SCOT HINSHAW (appearing pro hac vice) VEDDER PRICE P.C. 222 North LaSalle Street, Suite 2600 Chicago, IL 60601-1003 Telephone: (312) 609-7500 Facsimile: (312) 609-5005 13 14 Counsel for Defendant(s): STERICYCLE, INC. 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 LIZA RUSHING, Plaintiff, 19 20 21 22 23 Case No. CV 12-04692 CRB vs. STERICYCLE, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and Does 1-50, STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES CONTINUING THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERNCE TO JANUARY 18, 2013, at 8:30 a.m.; and, [PROPOSED] ORDER Defendants. 24 ____________________________________/ 25 The Parties by and through their attorneys of record stipulate as follows: 26 27 (1) Due to a scheduling conflict that arose the week of January 2nd, counsel for Defendant Stericycle, Inc is unable to attend the Initial Case Management Conference presently scheduled 28 1 STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES CONTINUING THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERNCE TO JANUARY 18, 2013, at 8:30 a.m.; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case3:12-cv-04692-CRB Document22 Filed01/03/13 Page2 of 3 1 for January 11, 2013. The Parties have conferred and stipulate to continue the Initial Case 2 Management Conference to January 18, 2013, at 8:30 a.m. The Parties cleared this date with 3 the Court prior to submitting this Stipulation. 4 (2) The Parties have conferred, completed and filed their Joint Case Management Conference 5 Statement in compliance with the Court’s Order Setting Case Management Conference. 6 (3) This brief continuance is necessary to comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 26(f) 7 and Civil Local Rule 16-10(a) and is not being made for any improper purpose such as to cause 8 delay in the proceedings or to gain a tactical advantage. 9 10 Dated: January 3, 2013 COOPER & MORA, PC 11 By: __/s/ Beth W. Mora______________ Beth W. Mora Counsel for Plaintiff, LIZA RUSHING 12 13 14 Dated: January 3, 2013 VEDDER PRICE, PC 15 By: __/s/ Steven Hamann______________ Steven Hamann Counsel for Defendant STERICYCLE, INC. 16 17 18 Dated: January 3, 2013 DESOUZA LAW OFFICES a professional corporation 19 20 By: __/s/ Jacqueline deSouza______________ Jacqueline deSouza Counsel for Defendant STERICYCLE, INC. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES CONTINUING THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERNCE TO JANUARY 18, 2013, at 8:30 a.m.; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case3:12-cv-04692-CRB Document22 Filed01/03/13 Page3 of 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 Good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS as follows: 3 The Initial Case Management Conference in the matter Liza Rushing v. Stericycle, Inc., case no.: CV 4 12-04692 CRB is continued from January 11, 2013, to January 18, 2013, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 6, 5 17th Floor 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA. 6 J ER H 13 RT 12 R NIA . Breyer arles R udge Ch NO 11 14 FO 10 DERED O OR IT IS S A 9 S DISTRICT TE C TA LI 4 Dated: January ___, 2013 UNIT ED 8 S IT IS SO ORDERED. RT U O 7 N F D IS T IC T O R C 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES CONTINUING THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERNCE TO JANUARY 18, 2013, at 8:30 a.m.; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?