Alvarez-Orellana v. City of Antioch et al

Filing 11

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 12/17/2012. Replies to 7 MOTION to Dismiss due by 12/17/2012. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on December 5, 2012. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

Northern District of California

United States District Court

11
12

LUIS A. ALVAREZ-ORELLANA,
Plaintiff,

13

Case No.: 12-cv-04693 JSC
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v.

14
15
16

CITY OF ANITOCH, et al.,
Defendants.

17
18
19

Now pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, filed November 9,

20

2012.1 (Dkt. No. 7.) Plaintiff has not filed an Opposition or Statement of Nonopposition to

21

the Motion to Dismiss, as required by Local Rule 7-3(b). Accordingly, the Court hereby

22

ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE as to why this action should not be dismissed for failure

23

to prosecute. Plaintiff should file a response to the ORDER to SHOW CAUSE, along with a

24

response to the Motion to Dismiss, on or before December 17, 2012. If Plaintiff files an

25

opposition, Defendants reply is due by January 7, 2013.

26
27
28

1

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Plaintiff and the appearing Defendants consented to the
jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. (Dkt. Nos. 5, 13.)

1
2
3

If no response is received, this action may be dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), for failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5

Dated: December 5, 2012
_________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7

8
9
10

Northern District of California

United States District Court

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

23
24
25
26
27
28

2