Alvarez-Orellana v. City of Antioch et al

Filing 50

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER re 49 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Leroy D. Baca. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/13/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2013)

1 JOHN F. KRATTLI, County Counsel
ROGER H. GRANBO,Assistant County Counsel
2 JONATHAN McCAVERTY Senior Deputy County Counsel
(_SBN 210922_)__•jmccave~ty~a counsel.lacounty.gov
3 648 Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration
500 West Temple Street
4 Los Angeles California 90012-2713
Telephone: [phone] •Fax:[phone]
5
Attorneys for Defendant
6 LEROY D.BACA
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11 LUIS A. ALVAREZ-ORELLANA,
Plaintiff,

12
13

v.

14 CITY OF ANTIOCH,et al.,

CASE NO. C 12-4693 EMC
STIPULATION AND rPROPOSED]
ORDER SETTING D~STE FOR
DEFENDANT LEROY D.BACA TO
RESPOND TO THE FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT

Defendants.

15
16

The parties, PlaintiffLuis Alvarez-Orellana, by and through his attorney of
17
record, Enrique Ramirez ofthe Law Offices ofEnrique Ramirez, and Defendant
18
Leroy D. Baca, by and through his attorney ofrecord, Deputy County Counsel
19
Jonathan McCaverty, hereby stipulate that the said defendant's response to Plaintiffs
20
First Amended Complaint must be filed with the Court and served on the parties on
21
or before May 23, 2013.
22
23
24
25
26
27

HOA.977838.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
28 ORDER SETTING DATE FOR
DEFENDANT LEROY D. BACA TO
RESPOND TO THE FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT

C 12-4693 ,M ,

1

So stipulated.

2
3 DATED: May 8, 2013

Respectfully submitted,

4

JOHN F. KRATTLI
County Counsel

5
6

/s/ Jonathan McCaverty
JONATHAN McCAVERTY
Senior Deputy County Counsel

By
8
9
10

Attorneys for Defendant
LEROY D. BACA

11
12
13 DATED: May 8, 2013

LAW OFFICES OF ENRIQUE IZAMIREZ

14
15

By

16
17
18

/s/ Enrique Ramirez
Enrique Ramirez

Attorneys for Plaintiff
LUIS ALVAREZ-ORELLANA

19'.
20~
21
22
23
24
25
26
27 xoA.a~~s3s.i
STIPULATION AND[PROPOSED]
28 ORDER SETTING DATE FOR
DEFENDANT LEROY D.BACA TO
RESPOND TO THE FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT

C 12-4693 F,M '

-2-

1
2
3

[PROPOSED]ORDER
Having reviewed the Stipulation ofthe parties regarding the filing due date of

4 Defendant Leroy D. Baca's response to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint, and
5 good cause appearing therefore,
6

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED,that Defendant Leroy D. Baca must file and

ER

H

14
15

R NIA

dwa
Judge E

FO

RT

13

hen

rd M. C

NO

12

LI

11

Chen
The Honorable Edward M.ED
DER
SO OR
IT IS
United States District Court Judge

A

10

UNIT
ED

S

RT
U
O

7 serve a response to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint by May 23, 2013.
S DISTRICT
8
TE
C
13
TA
9 ~ May T,2013

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27 xoa.9~~s3a.i
STIPULATION AND[PROPOSED]
28 ORDER SETTING DATE FOR
DEFENDANT LEROY D. BACA TO
RESPOND TO THE FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT

C 12-4693 FMC

-3-