Alvarez-Orellana v. City of Antioch et al

Filing 62

STIPULATION AND ORDER 61 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER on filing Opposition to Motion to Dismiss and Reply thereto, filed by Luis A. Alvarez-Orellana., Set/Reset Deadlines as to 61 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER on fili ng Opposition to Motion to Dismiss and Reply thereto,, 51 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Responses due by 6/17/2013. Replies due by 6/24/2013. Motion Hearing set for 7/11/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/31/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

ENRIQUE RAMIREZ SBN 98751
Law Office of Enrique Ramirez
825 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 304
San Francisco, CA 94109
[phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorney for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8

LUIS A. ALVAREZ-ORELLANA
9

Plaintiffs,
10

vs.
11

CITY OF ANTIOCH et al.,
12

Defendants,
13
14
15
16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: C12-4693 EMC
Plaintiff ALVAREZ’ & Defendant DAVID O.
LIVINGSTON’S STIPULATION ON FILING
OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO
DISMISS AND REPLY THEREON
Date:
June 27, 2013
Time:
1:30 p.m.
Courtroom: 5, 17th Fl.
Hon. Edward M. Chen

Plaintiff LUIS A. ALVARES-ORELLANA, by and through his attorney of record,

17

ENRIQUE RAMIREZ, and Defendant DAVID O. LIVINGSTON, by and through his attorney

18

of record, CHRISTOPHER B. WHITMAN, stipulate herein as follows:

19

As a result of pressing legal filing, Court appearances and a previously scheduled family

20

vacation, Plaintiff’s attorney, ENRIQUE RAMIREZ, is unable to complete and file Plaintiff

21

ALVAREZ’ Opposition to Defendant LIVINGSTONE’s Motion to Dismiss by May 31, 2013.

22

Accordingly, Plaintiff ALVAREZ, and Defendant DAVID O. LIVINGSTON, through

23
24

their attorneys of record have stipulated as follows;
Opposition to Defendant LIVINGSTON’s Motion to Dismiss will be filed by June 17,

25

2013 and any Reply thereon may be filed on June 24, 2013, if need be. The hearing on the

26

Motion to Dismiss therefore, should be re-calendared to July 11, 2013 at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom

27

5 before the Honorable Edward M. Chen.

28

PARTIES STIPULATION TO FILING OF RESPONSE AND REPLY ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS Page 1

1

Parties further stipulate that Honorable Judge Edward M. Chen, may issue an Order

2

approving the parties’ modification to the filing of Opposition and Reply to Defendants’ Motion

3

to Dismiss.

4
5
6

DATE: 05/30/2013

_____/s/________________ 05/30/2013 __________/s/_______________
Christopher B. Whitman
Enrique Ramirez
For David O. Livingston
For Luis A. Alvarez

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

PARTIES STIPULATION TO FILING OF RESPONSE AND REPLY ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS Page 2

1
2
3
4
5

ENRIQUE RAMIREZ SBN 98751
Law Office of Enrique Ramirez
825 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 304
San Francisco, CA 94109
[phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorney for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8

LUIS A. ALVAREZ-ORELLANA
9

Plaintiffs,
10

vs.
11

CITY OF ANTIOCH et al.,
12

Defendants,
13
14
15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: C12-4693 EMC
ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION
Date:
June 27, 2013
Time:
1:30 th
p.m.
Courtroom 5. 17 Fl.

Hon. Judge Edward M. Chen

16
17

Pursuant to Stipulation between, Plaintiff Luis A. Alvarez-Orellana and Defendant

18

DAVID O. LIVINGSTON, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT, Plaintiff’s opposition to

19

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss be filed by JUNE 17, 2013 and a Reply thereon, by JUNE 24,

20

2013. The hearing date and time for the Motion to Dismiss is now set for JULY 11, 2013 at

21

__1:30 p.m.

S

RT

27

R NIA

dwar
Judge E

ER

A

H

28

en

d M. Ch

NO

26

D

RDERE
Hon. Judge Edward M.O O
IS S Chen
IT

FO

25

DATED: 5/31/13
_________________________________

LI

24

UNIT
ED

23

RT
U
O

22

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

PARTIES STIPULATION TO FILING OF RESPONSE AND REPLY ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS Page 3