3CX, Ltd. v. Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC

Filing 40

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/20/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

John J. Edmonds (State Bar No. 274200)
[e-mail]
Andrew P. Tower (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
COLLINS EDMONDS POGORZELSKI
SCHLATHER & TOWER, PLLC
1851 East First Street, Suite 900
Santa Ana, California 92705
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
3CX, LTD.
Jonathan D. Baker (Cal Bar No. 196062)
FARNEY DANIELS, P.C.
411 Borel Ave., Suite 350
San Mateo, California 94402
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC

15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18
19
20
21

3CX, LTD.
Plaintiff(s),

22
23
24

vs.
BRANDYWIND COMMUNICATIONS
TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

25
26

Defendant(s).

)
)
) Case No. 3:12-cv-04729-RS
)
) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
) ORDER OF DISMISSAL
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

27
28

-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
OF DISMISSAL

CASE NO 3:12-CV-04729-RS

1
2

WHEREAS, Plaintiff 3CX, Ltd. and Defendant Brandywine Communications
Technologies, LLC have settled this matter on mutually-agreeable terms.

3

NOW, THEREFORE, on the basis of the settlement reached, pursuant to Federal Rule of

4

Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and

5

between the parties, through their undersigned counsel of record, that:

6
7
8

The parties hereby dismiss all claims and counterclaims between them in this matter with
prejudice.
Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

9
10

Dated: May 15, 2013

/s/ Andrew P. Tower
Attorneys for Plaintiff 3CX, Ltd.

11
12
13

Dated: May 15, 2013

14
15

Filer’s Attestation

16
17
18
19

/s/ Jonathan D. Baker
Attorneys for Defendant Brandywine
Communications Technologies, LLC

I, Andrew P. Tower, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file
this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL. In compliance with
General Order 45.X.B., I hereby attest that the above-named signatories concur in this filing.

20
21

Dated: May 15, 2013

/s/ Andrew P. Tower

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
OF DISMISSAL

CASE NO 3:12-CV-04729-RS

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3

5/20/13
Dated:__________________

4

HON. RICHARD SEEBORG

5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
OF DISMISSAL

CASE NO 3:12-CV-04729-RS