Geron Corporation v. Viacyte, Inc.

Filing 29

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 27 selecting Mediation by Geron Corporation filed by Geron Corporation, Case referred to mediation.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/18/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2012)

1

5

MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
WILLIAM G. GAEDE, III (136184)
[e-mail]
JUDITH S.H. HOM (203482)
[e-mail]
275 Middlefield Road, Suite 100
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

6

Attorneys for Geron Corporation

7

BARTKO, ZANKEL, TARRANT & MILLER
Benjamin K. Riley (112007)
[e-mail]
Jayne Laiprasert (256930)
[e-mail]
900 Front Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

2
3
4

8
9

11
12
SILICON VALLEY

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP

10

17

ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, P.C.
R. Danny Huntington (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Sharon E. Crane (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Seth E. Cockrum (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
607 14th Street, N.W., Suite 800
Washington, D.C. 2005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

18

Attorneys for ViaCyte, Inc.

13
14
15
16

19

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

20

IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

21
22
23

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
GERON CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation,
Plaintiff,

24
25
26
27

Case No. C-12-4813 EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

v.
VIACYTE, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Defendant.

28
DM_US 40266745-1.091700.0011

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE ADR PROCESS
CASE NO. C-12-4813 EMC

1
2

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5.

3

The parties agree to participate in Court Process Mediation under ADR L.R. 6-3.

4

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by June 30, 2013.

5

Dated:

MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY, LLP

December 13, 2012

6
By:

7

/s/ Judith S.H. Hom
Judith S.H. Hom

8

Attorneys for Plaintiff

9
Dated:

December 13, 2012

11

BARTKO, ZANKEL, TARRANT & MILLER
By:

I/s/ Benjamin K. Riley
Benjamin K. Riley

12
13

Dated:

December 13, 2012

14

ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK
By:

/s/ R. Danny Huntington
R. Danny Huntington

15

Attorneys for Defendant

16
17

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

18

Pursuant to General Order 45.X(B), I hereby attest that concurrence has been obtained

19

from Benjamin K. Riley and R. Danny Huntington indicated by a “conformed” signatures (/s/)

20

within this e-filed document.

21

/s/ Judith S.H. Hom
Judith S.H. Hom

22
-oOo-

23

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
ORDER

26
Dated:

12/18/12

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN
Judge of the United States District Court
n
M. Che
Edward
Judge

H

ER

LI

STIPULATION ORDER RE ADR PROCESS
CASE NO. C-12-4813 EMC

A

-1-

RT

DM_US 40266745-1.091700.0011

FO

NO

28

R NIA

25

27

RT
U
O

S

24

UNIT
ED

SILICON VALLEY

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP

10

N

D IS

CT

OF

C