Geron Corporation v. Viacyte, Inc.
Filing
29
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 27 selecting Mediation by Geron Corporation filed by Geron Corporation, Case referred to mediation.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/18/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2012)
1
5
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
WILLIAM G. GAEDE, III (136184)
wgaede@mwe.com
JUDITH S.H. HOM (203482)
jhom@mwe.com
275 Middlefield Road, Suite 100
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: (650) 815-7400
Facsimile:
(650) 815-7401
6
Attorneys for Geron Corporation
7
BARTKO, ZANKEL, TARRANT & MILLER
Benjamin K. Riley (112007)
briley@bztm.com
Jayne Laiprasert (256930)
jlaiprasert@bztm.com
900 Front Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 956-1900
Facsimile: (415) 956-1152
2
3
4
8
9
11
12
SILICON VALLEY
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP
10
17
ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, P.C.
R. Danny Huntington (pro hac vice)
dhuntington@rfem.com
Sharon E. Crane (pro hac vice)
scrane@rfem.com
Seth E. Cockrum (pro hac vice)
scockrum@rfem.com
607 14th Street, N.W., Suite 800
Washington, D.C. 2005
Telephone: (202) 783-6040
Facsimile: (202) 783-6031
18
Attorneys for ViaCyte, Inc.
13
14
15
16
19
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
20
IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
21
22
23
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
GERON CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation,
Plaintiff,
24
25
26
27
Case No. C-12-4813 EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
v.
VIACYTE, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Defendant.
28
DM_US 40266745-1.091700.0011
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE ADR PROCESS
CASE NO. C-12-4813 EMC
1
2
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5.
3
The parties agree to participate in Court Process Mediation under ADR L.R. 6-3.
4
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by June 30, 2013.
5
Dated:
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY, LLP
December 13, 2012
6
By:
7
/s/ Judith S.H. Hom
Judith S.H. Hom
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff
9
Dated:
December 13, 2012
11
BARTKO, ZANKEL, TARRANT & MILLER
By:
I/s/ Benjamin K. Riley
Benjamin K. Riley
12
13
Dated:
December 13, 2012
14
ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK
By:
/s/ R. Danny Huntington
R. Danny Huntington
15
Attorneys for Defendant
16
17
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
18
Pursuant to General Order 45.X(B), I hereby attest that concurrence has been obtained
19
from Benjamin K. Riley and R. Danny Huntington indicated by a “conformed” signatures (/s/)
20
within this e-filed document.
21
/s/ Judith S.H. Hom
Judith S.H. Hom
22
-oOo-
23
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
ORDER
26
Dated:
12/18/12
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN
Judge of the United States District Court
n
M. Che
Edward
Judge
H
ER
LI
STIPULATION ORDER RE ADR PROCESS
CASE NO. C-12-4813 EMC
A
-1-
RT
DM_US 40266745-1.091700.0011
FO
NO
28
R NIA
25
27
RT
U
O
S
24
UNIT
ED
SILICON VALLEY
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP
10
N
D IS
CT
OF
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?