Geron Corporation v. Viacyte, Inc.

Filing 29

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 27 selecting Mediation by Geron Corporation filed by Geron Corporation, Case referred to mediation.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/18/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2012)

Download PDF
1 5 MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP WILLIAM G. GAEDE, III (136184) JUDITH S.H. HOM (203482) 275 Middlefield Road, Suite 100 Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: (650) 815-7400 Facsimile: (650) 815-7401 6 Attorneys for Geron Corporation 7 BARTKO, ZANKEL, TARRANT & MILLER Benjamin K. Riley (112007) Jayne Laiprasert (256930) 900 Front Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 956-1900 Facsimile: (415) 956-1152 2 3 4 8 9 11 12 SILICON VALLEY ATTORNEYS AT LAW M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP 10 17 ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, P.C. R. Danny Huntington (pro hac vice) Sharon E. Crane (pro hac vice) Seth E. Cockrum (pro hac vice) 607 14th Street, N.W., Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 2005 Telephone: (202) 783-6040 Facsimile: (202) 783-6031 18 Attorneys for ViaCyte, Inc. 13 14 15 16 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 22 23 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION GERON CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, 24 25 26 27 Case No. C-12-4813 EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS v. VIACYTE, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. 28 DM_US 40266745-1.091700.0011 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE ADR PROCESS CASE NO. C-12-4813 EMC 1 2 Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. 3 The parties agree to participate in Court Process Mediation under ADR L.R. 6-3. 4 The parties agree to hold the ADR session by June 30, 2013. 5 Dated: MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY, LLP December 13, 2012 6 By: 7 /s/ Judith S.H. Hom Judith S.H. Hom 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff 9 Dated: December 13, 2012 11 BARTKO, ZANKEL, TARRANT & MILLER By: I/s/ Benjamin K. Riley Benjamin K. Riley 12 13 Dated: December 13, 2012 14 ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK By: /s/ R. Danny Huntington R. Danny Huntington 15 Attorneys for Defendant 16 17 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 18 Pursuant to General Order 45.X(B), I hereby attest that concurrence has been obtained 19 from Benjamin K. Riley and R. Danny Huntington indicated by a “conformed” signatures (/s/) 20 within this e-filed document. 21 /s/ Judith S.H. Hom Judith S.H. Hom 22 -oOo- 23 S DISTRICT TE C TA The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. ORDER 26 Dated: 12/18/12 DERED O OR IT IS S HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN Judge of the United States District Court n M. Che Edward Judge H ER LI STIPULATION ORDER RE ADR PROCESS CASE NO. C-12-4813 EMC A -1- RT DM_US 40266745-1.091700.0011 FO NO 28 R NIA 25 27 RT U O S 24 UNIT ED SILICON VALLEY ATTORNEYS AT LAW M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP 10 N D IS CT OF C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?