Grimes v. Krol et al

Filing 4

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 10/4/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 JEROME L. GRIMES, 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) v. ) ) ) KING SECURITY SERVICES, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________ ) Nos. C 12-4551 JSW (PR) C 12-4552 JSW (PR) C 12-4816 JSW (PR) C 12-4820 JSW (PR) C 12-4821 JSW (PR) C 12-4822 JSW (PR) C 12-4896 JSW (PR) C 12-4897 JSW (PR) C 12-4898 JSW (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL 14 15 Over the course of approximately three weeks, Plaintiff, an inmate in the San 16 Mateo County Jail and frequent litigator in this Court, filed these nine pro se civil rights 17 cases. On May 18, 2000, this Court informed Plaintiff that under the "three-strikes" 18 provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) he generally is ineligible to proceed in forma pauperis 19 in federal court with civil actions filed while he is incarcerated. See Grimes v. Oakland 20 Police Dept., C 00-1100 CW (Order Dismissing Complaint, 5/18/00). Since then, 21 Plaintiff has continued to file hundreds of civil actions seeking in forma pauperis status. 22 With respect to each action filed, the Court conducts a preliminary review to assess the 23 nature of the allegations and to determine whether Plaintiff alleges facts which bring him 24 within the "imminent danger of serious physical injury" exception to § 1915(g). In the 25 past, Plaintiff has routinely been granted leave to amend to pay the full filing fee and to 26 state cognizable claims for relief, but he has habitually failed to do so. For example, in 27 2003 alone Plaintiff's failure to comply resulted in the dismissal of approximately thirty- 28 six actions under § 1915(g). 1 In accord with this ongoing practice, the Court has reviewed the allegations in the 2 present actions and finds that Plaintiff alleges no facts which bring him within the 3 "imminent danger" clause. Succinctly put, these actions challenge the validity of the 4 arrest and criminal charges which led to his current incarceration. As has been explained 5 to Plaintiff countless times, such claims are barred under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 6 477 (1994) (state prisoner's § 1983 complaint for damages which implies invalidity of 7 conviction or sentence must be dismissed unless plaintiff demonstrates conviction or 8 sentence has already been invalidated). Therefore, it would be futile to grant Plaintiff 9 leave to amend. And even if Plaintiff did amend, he would be required to pay the 10 $350.00 filing fee, which he has never done. 11 Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice under § 1915(g). The 12 applications to proceed in forma pauperis are DENIED. No fee is due. If Plaintiff is so 13 inclined, he may bring his claims in a new action accompanied by the $350.00 filing fee. 14 In any event, the Court will continue to review under § 1915(g) all future actions filed by 15 Plaintiff while he is incarcerated in which he seeks in forma pauperis status. 16 17 18 19 The Clerk of the Court shall CLOSE the file and TERMINATE all pending motions. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 4, 2012 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JEFFREY S. WHITE United States District Judge 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 JEROME L GRIMES, Case Number: CV12-04551 JSW 6 Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 7 v. 8 JOHN DOE et al, 9 Defendant. 10 11 12 13 14 / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on October 4, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 15 16 17 18 Jerome L. Grimes 12675072 A-4, 9 bunk San Francisco County Jail #1 850 Bryant Street San Francisco, CA 94103 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: October 4, 2012 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 JEROME L GRIMES, Case Number: CV12-04552 JSW CV12-04816 JSW CV12-04820 JSW CV12-04821 JSW CV12-04822 JSW CV12-04896 JSW CV12-04897 JSW CV12-04898 JSW 6 Plaintiff, 7 v. 8 DR BRIAN SCEMENSKY et al, 9 Defendant. 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 11 12 13 14 15 / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on October 4, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 16 17 19 Jerome L. Grimes 1 Moreland Drive #12675072 San Bruno, CA 94066 20 Dated: October 4, 2012 18 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?