Henley v. Heineken USA

Filing 20

ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 2/4/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 Henley, 6 7 8 No. CV12-04835 JSW Plaintiff, v. Heineken USA, 9 Defendant. 10 / 11 Following the Case Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case For the Northern District of California United States District Court ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS 12 Management Statement is adopted, except as expressly modified by this Order. It is further 13 ORDERED that: 14 A. DATES 15 Jury Trial Date: 4/21/2014, at 8:00 a.m., 16 Jury Selection: 4/16/2014, at 8:00 a.m. 17 Pretrial Conference: Monday, 3/31/2014, at 2:00 p.m. 18 Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions: Friday, 1/24/2014, 9:00 a.m. 19 Last Day for Expert Disclosure: 9/30/2013 20 Last Day for Rebuttal Expert Disclosure: 10/30/2013 21 Close of ALL Discovery: 11/29/2013 22 23 B. DISCOVERY 24 The parties are reminded that a failure voluntarily to disclose information pursuant to 25 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) or to supplement disclosures or discovery responses 26 pursuant to Rule 26(e) may result in exclusionary sanctions. Thirty days prior to the close of 27 non-expert discovery, lead counsel for each party shall serve and file a certification that all 28 supplementation has been completed. 1 C. 2 This matter is referred to court-connected mediation, to be completed by May 31, 2013. 3 ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION The parties shall promptly notify the Court whether the case is resolved at the mediation. 4 D. PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING THIS ORDER 5 No provision of this order may be changed except by written order of this court upon its 6 own motion or upon motion of one or more parties made pursuant to Civil. L. R. 7-1 or 7-1-(b) 7 without a showing of very good cause. If the modification sought is an extension of a deadline 8 contained herein, the motion must be brought before expiration of that deadline. The parties 9 may not modify the pretrial schedule by stipulation. A conflict with a court date set after the date of this order does not constitute good cause. The parties are advised that if they stipulate to 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 a change in the discovery schedule, they do so at their own risk. The only discovery schedule 12 that the Court will enforce is the one set in this order. Additionally, briefing schedules that are 13 specifically set by the court may not be altered by stipulation; rather the parties must obtain 14 leave of Court. 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 Dated: February 4, 2013 17 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?