Ramirez v. County of Alameda et al

Filing 13

ORDER by Chief Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 11 Stipulation selecting Mediation (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2012)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ELISA RAMIREZ, Guardian ad Litem for A.S., minor, CASE NO. C12-4852-MEJ Plaintiff, v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al., Defendants. _______________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: ☐ Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) ☐ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) X Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: ☐ Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: ☐ the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) X other requested deadline 120 days from date of order referring case to mediation Dated: December 6, 2012 /s/ DeWitt Lacy Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: December 6, 2012 /s/ Michael Wenzel Attorney for Defendants CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE [PROPOSED] ORDER X ☐ ☐ The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 6, 2012 __________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARIA-ELENA JAMES When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.” Rev. 12/11 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?