Sidibe v. Sutter Health
Filing
968
Discovery Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. In the attached order, the court addresses the parties' discovery dispute at ECF No. 967. (lblc5S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2021)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
San Francisco Division
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
DJENEBA SIDIBE, et al.,
Case No. 12-cv-04854-LB
Plaintiffs,
12
DISCOVERY ORDER
v.
13
14
SUTTER HEALTH, et al.,
15
Re: ECF No. 967
Defendants.
16
17
The parties dispute the extent of document production and related deposition testimony. The
18
court can decide the issue without oral argument. Civil L. R. 7-1(b). First, as to the CARES Act
19
loan documents, executive compensation, and post-discovery documents related to the complaints,
20
Sutter represents that the issues will be resolved by April 30, 2021, and the court accepts that
21
representation and allows the production of information on the timeline that Sutter identifies.
22
Second, as to the search terms, Sutter sent a letter on March 18, 2021, and the plaintiffs must
23
respond to it.1 Thereafter, the parties must confer and then can raise any dispute with the court.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
Dated: March 29, 2021
26
______________________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge
27
28
1
Letter Brief – ECF No. 967 at 1, 4; March 18, 2021 Letter, Ex. D to id. – ECF No. 967-2 at 2.
ORDER – No. 12-cv-04854-LB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?