Sidibe v. Sutter Health

Filing 968

Discovery Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. In the attached order, the court addresses the parties' discovery dispute at ECF No. 967. (lblc5S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2021)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

San Francisco Division

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

DJENEBA SIDIBE, et al.,

Case No. 12-cv-04854-LB

Plaintiffs,

12

DISCOVERY ORDER

v.

13
14

SUTTER HEALTH, et al.,

15

Re: ECF No. 967

Defendants.

16
17

The parties dispute the extent of document production and related deposition testimony. The

18

court can decide the issue without oral argument. Civil L. R. 7-1(b). First, as to the CARES Act

19

loan documents, executive compensation, and post-discovery documents related to the complaints,

20

Sutter represents that the issues will be resolved by April 30, 2021, and the court accepts that

21

representation and allows the production of information on the timeline that Sutter identifies.

22

Second, as to the search terms, Sutter sent a letter on March 18, 2021, and the plaintiffs must

23

respond to it.1 Thereafter, the parties must confer and then can raise any dispute with the court.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

Dated: March 29, 2021

26

______________________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge

27
28

1

Letter Brief – ECF No. 967 at 1, 4; March 18, 2021 Letter, Ex. D to id. – ECF No. 967-2 at 2.

ORDER – No. 12-cv-04854-LB