Nia v. Hedgpeth

Filing 53

ORDER, Motions terminated: 52 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 51 Clerk's Notice, Continuing Case Management Conference filed by R. T.C. Grounds, Kathleen Dickenson, A. Hedgpeth, D. Asuncion. Initial Case Management Conference set for11/12/14 is continued to 12/8/2014 02:30 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 11/10/14. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2014)

Download PDF
1 KAMALA D. HARRIS 2 MARISA Y. KIRSCHENBAUER 3 GIAMM. NGUYEN Attorney General of California Supervising Deputy Attorney General 4 5 6 7 Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 229236 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Telephone: (415) 703-5686 Fax: (415) 703-5843 E-mail: Giam.Nguyen@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendants 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 C 12-4858 SI (PR) AASIMNIA, Plaintiff, 14 15 v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING ·cASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 16 A. HEDGPETH, et al., Defendants. 18 19 l November 12,2014 2:30p.m. Courtroom 10, 19th Floor Dept: The Honorable Susan Illston Judge: Action Filed: September 7, 2012 Date: 17 Time:-~ 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Case Mgmt. Conference (C 12-4858 SI (PR)) 1 The Court has set a case management conference for November 12, 2014 at 2:30p.m. ECF 2 . no. 51. The parties have met and conferred regarding the timing of the case management 3 conference. Plaintiffs counsel previously proposed a stipulated continuance of the case 4 management conference due to a scheduling conflict with other obligations. Defendant's counsel 5 agreed to stipulate to a continuance and then scheduled other obligations in other cases. 6 Plaintiffs counsel has recently indicated that their scheduling conflict no longer exists, but 7 Defendant's counsel continues to have scheduling conflicts. Thus, good cause exists to continue 8 the case management conference. Under Civil Local Rule 7-12, the parties stipulate to this 9 request to continue the case management conference until December 8, 2014 at 2:30p.m. 10 11 12 Dated: November 2, 2014 13 Is/ David Fermino Counsel for Plaintiff 14 15 16 17 18 Dated: November 2, 2014 Is/ Giam M Nguyen Counsel for Defendants 19 20 Attestation Under N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rule 5-l(i) 21 I, Giam Nguyen, attest and declare as follows: 22 Concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from all signatories, and shall 23 24 25 serve in lieu of their signatures on the document. I declare underpenalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signed O!l November 2, 2014 in San Francisco, California. 26 Is/ Giam M Nguyen Giam M. Nguyen 27 28 1 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Case Mgmt. Conference (C 12-4858 SI (PR)) 1 2 3 ORDER The case management conference scheduled for November 12, 2014 is taken off calendar. A case management conference shall be held on December 8, 2014 at 2:30pm. 4 5 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 8 11/10/14 The Honorable Susan Illston United States District Court Judge Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Case Mgmt. Conference (C 12-4858 SI (PR)) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Case Name: Nia v. Hedgpeth · No. C 12-4858 SI (PR) I hereby certify that on November 3, 2014, I electronically filed the following documents with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that service will be accomplished by the CM/ECF system. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on November 3, 2014, at San Francisco, California. A. Reagin Declarant 41123048.doc Is/ A. Reagin Signature

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?