Robinson Rancheria of Pomo Indians v. Salazar et al

Filing 13

Order by Hon. Samuel Conti granting 11 Stipulation re Extension of Time.(sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

MELINDA HAAG (CSBN 132612)
United States Attorney
ALEX G. TSE (CSBN 152348)
Chief, Civil Division
REBECCA A. FALK (CSBN 226798)
Assistant United States Attorney
450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055
San Francisco, California 94102-3495
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for the Federal Defendant

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

12
13
14
15
16
17
18

ROBINSON RANCHERIA OF POMO
INDIANS,

)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
KENNETH SALAZAR, in his official
)
capacity as the Secretary of the United States)
Department of the Interior; AMY
)
DUTSCHKE, in her official capacity as
)
Pacific Regional Director for the Bureau of )
Indian Affairs,
)

19

No. C 12-04885 SC
STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME
TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendants

20
21

Federal defendants Kenneth Salazar, Secretary, United States Department of the Interior,

22

and Amy Dutschke, in her official capacity as Pacific Regional Director for the Bureau of Indian

23

Affairs (collectively, "Defendants") and Plaintiff Robinson Rancheria of Pomo Indians

24

(“Plaintiff”), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to extend the time for Defendant

25

to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2 of the

26

Northern District of California, as follows:

27
28

1.

On September 18, 2012, Plaintiff filed its Complaint for Declaratory and

Injunctive Relief (“Complaint”) (Dkt. No. 1);
2.

On October 1, 2012, the U.S. Attorney’s Office received a copy of Plaintiff’s

STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
C 12-04885 SC

Complaint by personal service;
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

3.

On November 30, 2012, Defendants filed Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s

Complaint. (Dkt. No. 7). On December 14, 2012, Plaintiff filed a timely Opposition to
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 9). On December 21, 2012, Defendants filed a reply
(Dkt. 10);
4.

On December 21, 2012, Plaintiff will file a Motion for Summary Judgment;

5.

The parties have agreed to an extension of time for Defendants to respond to the

Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment to January 14, 2013 and for Plaintiff to file its reply
until January 23, 2013;
6.

No prior extensions of time have been requested or granted; and

7.

This change will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by

Court order.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Defendants
that Defendants will have until January 14, 2013 to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary
Judgment and that Plaintiff will have until January 23, 2013 to file its Reply.

15
16

DATED: December 21, 2012

17

Respectfully submitted,
____/s/ Lester Marston_______
Lester Marston
Attorneys for Plaintiff

18
19
20

DATED: December 21, 2012

21

Respectfully submitted,
MELINDA HAAG
United States Attorney
____/s/ Rebecca Falk____________
REBECCA FALK
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendants

22
23
24
25

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

DATED:

December 28, 2012

_______________________________________
HONORABLE SAMUEL CONTI
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
C 12-04885 SC