Hohu v. Hatch
Filing
20
ORDER Re Supplemental Briefing. Supplemental Cross-Briefs shall be filed by 1/10/2013 05:00 PM. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/4/2013. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
LINDA HOHU,
9
Plaintiff,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL
BRIEFING
v.
WENDY HATCH,
12
13
No. C-12-4906 EMC
Defendant.
___________________________________/
14
15
16
Defendant Wendy Hatch, the administrator of the estate of John K. Hohu, filed a motion to
17
dismiss a complaint for declaratory relief brought by Plaintiff Linda Hohu pursuant to the Employee
18
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et. seq. Defendant requests
19
that this Court “dismiss this action pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(1) on the grounds that the federal court
20
lacks subject matter jurisdiction (federal question) over the Plaintiff’s ‘Complaint for Declaratory
21
Relief (Federal Preemption),’ as previously determined by U.S. District Court Judge Josephine
22
Staton Tucker on September 12, 2012 in the United States District Court Central District Southern
23
Division Case No: SACV 12-1067-JST.” Def.’s Mot. to Dismiss at 2 (Docket No. 13). Defendant’s
24
motion raises, but does not fully brief, whether the doctrine of collateral estoppel applies to this
25
matter.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
The parties shall file supplemental cross-briefs not to exceed six pages in length addressing
2
collateral estoppel and its application to prior judicial determinations of a lack of subject matter
3
jurisdiction. The parties shall file their cross-briefs with this Court no later than 5:00 p.m. on
4
January 10, 2013.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated: January 4, 2013
9
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?