Hohu v. Hatch

Filing 20

ORDER Re Supplemental Briefing. Supplemental Cross-Briefs shall be filed by 1/10/2013 05:00 PM. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/4/2013. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 LINDA HOHU, 9 Plaintiff, For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING v. WENDY HATCH, 12 13 No. C-12-4906 EMC Defendant. ___________________________________/ 14 15 16 Defendant Wendy Hatch, the administrator of the estate of John K. Hohu, filed a motion to 17 dismiss a complaint for declaratory relief brought by Plaintiff Linda Hohu pursuant to the Employee 18 Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et. seq. Defendant requests 19 that this Court “dismiss this action pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(1) on the grounds that the federal court 20 lacks subject matter jurisdiction (federal question) over the Plaintiff’s ‘Complaint for Declaratory 21 Relief (Federal Preemption),’ as previously determined by U.S. District Court Judge Josephine 22 Staton Tucker on September 12, 2012 in the United States District Court Central District Southern 23 Division Case No: SACV 12-1067-JST.” Def.’s Mot. to Dismiss at 2 (Docket No. 13). Defendant’s 24 motion raises, but does not fully brief, whether the doctrine of collateral estoppel applies to this 25 matter. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 The parties shall file supplemental cross-briefs not to exceed six pages in length addressing 2 collateral estoppel and its application to prior judicial determinations of a lack of subject matter 3 jurisdiction. The parties shall file their cross-briefs with this Court no later than 5:00 p.m. on 4 January 10, 2013. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: January 4, 2013 9 _________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?