Somaya et al v. Bank of India

Filing 45

ORDER granting 44 STIPULATION Dismissing Jitu Somaya As Plaintiff filed by Bank of India. Jitu Somaya terminated., Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 12/17/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2013)

1
2
3
4

SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP
ROBERT C. FRIESE (Bar #52392)
JOSEPH V. MAUCH (Bar #253693)
ROEY Z. RAHMIL (Bar #273803)
One Maritime Plaza, Eighteenth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3598
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

5
Attorneys for Defendant BANK OF INDIA
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ONE MARITIME PLAZA
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3598

SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP

11

JITU SOMAYA AND ZARIKA SOMAYA,

12
13
14

Case No. C 12-04926 CRB

Plaintiffs,

STIPULATION AND ORDER
DISMISSING JITU SOMAYA
AS PLAINTIFF

v.
BANK OF INDIA,

15

Defendant.

Judge:

Hon. Charles R. Breyer

16
17
18

The parties, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree that this

19

case is dismissed, without prejudice, as to Plaintiff Jitu Somaya only. This Stipulation shall have

20

no effect on the claims of Plaintiff Zarika Somaya.

21
22

Dated: December 16, 2013

SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP
/S/ROBERT C. FRIESE

23
By:

24

ROBERT C. FRIESE

Attorneys for Plaintiffs JITU SOMAYA and
ZARIKA SOMAYA

25
26
27
28
Case No.
C 12-04926 CRB

-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING JITU
SOMAYA AS PLAINTIFF

1

Dated: December 16, 2013

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITMAN LLP

2

/S/MICHAEL J. KASS

3

By:

4

Attorneys for Defendant BANK OF INDIA

MICHAEL J. KASS

5
6
Pursuant to stipulation of the parties, this case is dismissed without prejudice as to

ER

H

14

FO

13

15
16

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No.
C 12-04926 CRB

D

RDERE

OO
IT IS S

UNITED STATES DISTRICT
JUDGE
er
R. Brey
Charles
Judge

RT

ONE MARITIME PLAZA
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3598

NO

SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP

12

UNIT
ED

Dated: December 17, 2013
11

RT
U
O

10

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

LI

9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

R NIA

Plaintiff Jitu Somaya only.

S

8

A

7

-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING JITU
SOMAYA AS PLAINTIFF

C

1
2

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this
document has been obtained from all other signatories thereto.

3
4

Dated: December 16, 2013

SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP
/S/ROBERT C. FRIESE

5
By:

6

ROBERT C. FRIESE

Attorneys for Plaintiffs JITU SOMAYA and
ZARIKA SOMAYA

7
8
9
10

ONE MARITIME PLAZA
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3598

SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP

11
12
08418\001\4068181.v1

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No.
C 12-04926 CRB

-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING JITU
SOMAYA AS PLAINTIFF