Simpson v. Doubletree Management LLC et al

Filing 40

ORDER (1) REGARDING HEARING DATES AND (2) REQUIRING FURTHER SUBMISSIONS IN SUPPORT OF THE MOTIONS TO TRANSFER. Motion Hearing set for 3/22/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jeffrey S. White.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 1/2/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/2/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 LATROYA SIMPSON, 10 Plaintiff, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 9 12 No. C 12-04928 JSW v. No. C 12-05169 JSW DOUBLETREE MANAGEMENT LLC, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 / 15 16 ANDRE MCMAHON and LATROYA SIMPSON, 17 ORDER (1) REGARDING HEARING DATES AND (2) REQUIRING FURTHER SUBMISSIONS IN SUPPORT OF THE MOTIONS TO TRANSFER Plaintiffs, 18 19 20 v. EMBASSY SUITES MANAGEMENT LLC, Defendant / 21 22 Motions to transfer and motions to dismiss or, in the alternative, to strike the class 23 allegations are currently pending in both of the above captioned matters. When the action 24 against Embassy Suites Management LLC (“Embassy Suites”) was related to the action against 25 DoubleTree Management and DoubleTree DTWC LLC (collectively, “DoubleTree”), parties 26 were instructed that any dates for noticed motions had been vacated and must be re-noticed 27 before the newly assigned judge by the moving party. Despite this clear instruction, Embassy 28 Suites has not yet re-noticed the motion to transfer or the motion to dismiss or, in the 1 alternative, to strike. Nevertheless, the Court HEREBY SETS these motions to be heard on 2 March 22, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. The Court CONTINUES the motion to transfer and the motion to 3 dismiss or, in the alternative, to strike filed by DoubleTree to be heard on the same day, March 4 22, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. 5 In their motions to transfer, DoubleTree and Embassy Suites show that they are both 6 owned by Hilton Worldwide, Inc., the same defendant in Young v. Hilton Worldwide, Inc., et 7 al., Case No. CV12-1788, in the United States District Court for the Central District of 8 California. In Young, the plaintiff alleged he called the Hilton Reservations Worldwide, LLC 9 doing business as Hilton Reservations and Customer Care (“Hilton Reservations”) to ask about hotel rates and/or to make hotel reservations at the Hampton Inn. He further alleged that the 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 defendant hotel recorded, monitored, or eavesdropped on their calls without obtaining their 12 consent, in violation of a California penal provision. Plaintiffs in the above captioned cases 13 assert the same allegations against DoubleTree and Embassy Suites. 14 In support of their motions to transfer, DoubleTree and Embassy Suites argue, but fail to 15 submit any supporting evidence, that Hilton Worldwide, Inc. operates the reservation call 16 centers that service calls for hotels in all of its brands, including the Hampton Inn, DoubleTree, 17 and Embassy Suites. If the same call centers answer the calls for all three hotels, then the Court 18 finds that the cases would be related and judicial economy would be served by transferring 19 these matters to the Central District. However, if the calls are answered by different call 20 centers, and the defendant hotels are merely owned by the same company, then there would not 21 be sufficient factual overlap to warrant transfer. In the absence of any evidence on this point, 22 the Court cannot make an informed decision. Therefore, the Court HEREBY ORDERS 23 DoubleTree and Embassy Suites to submit evidence to describe and demonstrate who services 24 the calls for their reservations. DoubleTree and Embassy Suites shall submit such supplemental 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 2 1 evidence by no later than January 18, 2013. Plaintiffs may respond to this supplemental 2 evidence by no later than January 28, 2013. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: January 2, 2013 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?