Simpson v. Doubletree Management LLC et al
Filing
40
ORDER (1) REGARDING HEARING DATES AND (2) REQUIRING FURTHER SUBMISSIONS IN SUPPORT OF THE MOTIONS TO TRANSFER. Motion Hearing set for 3/22/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jeffrey S. White.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 1/2/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/2/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
LATROYA SIMPSON,
10
Plaintiff,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
9
12
No. C 12-04928 JSW
v.
No. C 12-05169 JSW
DOUBLETREE MANAGEMENT LLC, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
/
15
16
ANDRE MCMAHON and LATROYA
SIMPSON,
17
ORDER (1) REGARDING
HEARING DATES AND (2)
REQUIRING FURTHER
SUBMISSIONS IN SUPPORT OF
THE MOTIONS TO TRANSFER
Plaintiffs,
18
19
20
v.
EMBASSY SUITES MANAGEMENT LLC,
Defendant
/
21
22
Motions to transfer and motions to dismiss or, in the alternative, to strike the class
23
allegations are currently pending in both of the above captioned matters. When the action
24
against Embassy Suites Management LLC (“Embassy Suites”) was related to the action against
25
DoubleTree Management and DoubleTree DTWC LLC (collectively, “DoubleTree”), parties
26
were instructed that any dates for noticed motions had been vacated and must be re-noticed
27
before the newly assigned judge by the moving party. Despite this clear instruction, Embassy
28
Suites has not yet re-noticed the motion to transfer or the motion to dismiss or, in the
1
alternative, to strike. Nevertheless, the Court HEREBY SETS these motions to be heard on
2
March 22, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. The Court CONTINUES the motion to transfer and the motion to
3
dismiss or, in the alternative, to strike filed by DoubleTree to be heard on the same day, March
4
22, 2013 at 9:00 a.m.
5
In their motions to transfer, DoubleTree and Embassy Suites show that they are both
6
owned by Hilton Worldwide, Inc., the same defendant in Young v. Hilton Worldwide, Inc., et
7
al., Case No. CV12-1788, in the United States District Court for the Central District of
8
California. In Young, the plaintiff alleged he called the Hilton Reservations Worldwide, LLC
9
doing business as Hilton Reservations and Customer Care (“Hilton Reservations”) to ask about
hotel rates and/or to make hotel reservations at the Hampton Inn. He further alleged that the
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
defendant hotel recorded, monitored, or eavesdropped on their calls without obtaining their
12
consent, in violation of a California penal provision. Plaintiffs in the above captioned cases
13
assert the same allegations against DoubleTree and Embassy Suites.
14
In support of their motions to transfer, DoubleTree and Embassy Suites argue, but fail to
15
submit any supporting evidence, that Hilton Worldwide, Inc. operates the reservation call
16
centers that service calls for hotels in all of its brands, including the Hampton Inn, DoubleTree,
17
and Embassy Suites. If the same call centers answer the calls for all three hotels, then the Court
18
finds that the cases would be related and judicial economy would be served by transferring
19
these matters to the Central District. However, if the calls are answered by different call
20
centers, and the defendant hotels are merely owned by the same company, then there would not
21
be sufficient factual overlap to warrant transfer. In the absence of any evidence on this point,
22
the Court cannot make an informed decision. Therefore, the Court HEREBY ORDERS
23
DoubleTree and Embassy Suites to submit evidence to describe and demonstrate who services
24
the calls for their reservations. DoubleTree and Embassy Suites shall submit such supplemental
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
2
1
evidence by no later than January 18, 2013. Plaintiffs may respond to this supplemental
2
evidence by no later than January 28, 2013.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: January 2, 2013
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?