Brooks v. U.S. Bank, N.A.

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 18 filing of CMC Statement filed by U.S. Bank, N.A. Case Management Statement due by 1/15/2013.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/11/13. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 JOAN B. TUCKER FIFE (SBN: 144572) jfife@winston.com WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 101 California Street, Suite 3900 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-591-1000 Facsimile: 415-591-1400 EMILIE WOODHEAD (SBN: 240464) ewoodhead@winston.com WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 333 South Grand Avenue, Suite 3800 Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543 Telephone: (213) 615-1700 Facsimile: (213) 615-1750 Attorneys for Defendant U.S. BANK, N.A. 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 Winston & Strawn LLP 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 CYNTHIA BROOKS, an individual, 14 15 16 Plaintiff, v. U.S. BANK, N.A. and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive, 17 18 Defendants. 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C12-4935 EMC [Assigned for all purposes to the Honorable Edward M. Chen] STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Complaint Filed August 21, 2012 20 21 22 23 Subject to the approval of this Court, the parties hereby stipulate to a short extension of the 24 deadline for the parties’ Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 26(f) report pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 6 and Local 25 Rule 6-2. 26 The parties’ joint 26(f) report is currently due January 10, 2013 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 27 Proc. 26. Defendant U.S. Bank, N.A. (“U.S. Bank”) requests a 5 calendar-day extension, moving 28 the parties’ deadline to file their joint Rule 26(f) report to January 15, 2013. U.S. Bank requests this STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME– CASE NO. C12-04935 EMC 1 extension because it is in the process of gathering additional information pertinent to this case and 2 U.S. Bank’s outside legal counsel anticipates a meeting with U.S. Bank representatives on January 3 14, 2013 regarding issues that impact the parties’ joint statement. The parties will be able to file a 4 much more complete and informed joint statement once U.S. Bank has gathered additional 5 information and met with appropriate personnel. 6 Plaintiff Cynthia Brooks does not object to U.S. Bank’s request. Therefore, pursuant to 7 Local Rule 6-2, and because there is good cause for the modest extension of the deadline for the 8 parties’ Rule 26(f) report, the parties respectfully request the Court’s approval. SO STIPULATED: 9 Dated: January 9, 2013 By: /s/ Harvey Sohnen___ Attorneys for Plaintiff Cynthia Brooks 11 12 13 Dated: January 9, 2013 14 By: /s/ Emilie C. Woodhead__ Attorneys for Defendant U.S. BANK N.A. 15 16 WINSTON & STRAWN LLP PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 17 21 S UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 22 n M. Che LI ER A H 25 RT 24 dward Judge E NO 23 D RDERE OO IT IS S R NIA 20 Dated: S DISTRICT TE C TA EDWARD M. CHEN RT U O 19 1/11/13 FO 18 UNIT ED 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 Winston & Strawn LLP 10 LAW OFFICES OF SOHNEN & KELLY N F D IS T IC T O R C 26 27 28 1 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME – CASE NO. C12-04935 EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?