Brooks v. U.S. Bank, N.A.

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 18 filing of CMC Statement filed by U.S. Bank, N.A. Case Management Statement due by 1/15/2013.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/11/13. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

JOAN B. TUCKER FIFE (SBN: 144572)
[e-mail]
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
101 California Street, Suite 3900
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
415-591-1400
EMILIE WOODHEAD (SBN: 240464)
[e-mail]
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
333 South Grand Avenue, Suite 3800
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
U.S. BANK, N.A.

101 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-5802

Winston & Strawn LLP

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13

CYNTHIA BROOKS, an individual,

14
15
16

Plaintiff,
v.
U.S. BANK, N.A. and DOES 1 through 10
inclusive,

17
18

Defendants.

19

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. C12-4935 EMC
[Assigned for all purposes to the Honorable
Edward M. Chen]
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
CHANGING TIME AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER

Complaint Filed August 21, 2012

20
21
22
23

Subject to the approval of this Court, the parties hereby stipulate to a short extension of the

24

deadline for the parties’ Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 26(f) report pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 6 and Local

25

Rule 6-2.

26

The parties’ joint 26(f) report is currently due January 10, 2013 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.

27

Proc. 26. Defendant U.S. Bank, N.A. (“U.S. Bank”) requests a 5 calendar-day extension, moving

28

the parties’ deadline to file their joint Rule 26(f) report to January 15, 2013. U.S. Bank requests this

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME– CASE NO. C12-04935 EMC

1

extension because it is in the process of gathering additional information pertinent to this case and

2

U.S. Bank’s outside legal counsel anticipates a meeting with U.S. Bank representatives on January

3

14, 2013 regarding issues that impact the parties’ joint statement. The parties will be able to file a

4

much more complete and informed joint statement once U.S. Bank has gathered additional

5

information and met with appropriate personnel.

6

Plaintiff Cynthia Brooks does not object to U.S. Bank’s request. Therefore, pursuant to

7

Local Rule 6-2, and because there is good cause for the modest extension of the deadline for the

8

parties’ Rule 26(f) report, the parties respectfully request the Court’s approval. SO STIPULATED:

9

Dated: January 9, 2013

By: /s/ Harvey Sohnen___
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Cynthia Brooks

11
12
13

Dated: January 9, 2013

14

By: /s/ Emilie C. Woodhead__
Attorneys for Defendant
U.S. BANK N.A.

15
16

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

17

21

S

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

22

n

M. Che

LI

ER

A

H

25

RT

24

dward
Judge E

NO

23

D

RDERE

OO
IT IS S

R NIA

20

Dated:

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
EDWARD M. CHEN

RT
U
O

19

1/11/13

FO

18

UNIT
ED

101 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-5802

Winston & Strawn LLP

10

LAW OFFICES OF SOHNEN & KELLY

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

26
27
28
1
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME – CASE NO. C12-04935 EMC