Brooks v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Filing
19
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 18 filing of CMC Statement filed by U.S. Bank, N.A. Case Management Statement due by 1/15/2013.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/11/13. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
JOAN B. TUCKER FIFE (SBN: 144572)
jfife@winston.com
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
101 California Street, Suite 3900
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: 415-591-1000
Facsimile:
415-591-1400
EMILIE WOODHEAD (SBN: 240464)
ewoodhead@winston.com
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
333 South Grand Avenue, Suite 3800
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543
Telephone:
(213) 615-1700
Facsimile:
(213) 615-1750
Attorneys for Defendant
U.S. BANK, N.A.
101 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-5802
Winston & Strawn LLP
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
CYNTHIA BROOKS, an individual,
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
v.
U.S. BANK, N.A. and DOES 1 through 10
inclusive,
17
18
Defendants.
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. C12-4935 EMC
[Assigned for all purposes to the Honorable
Edward M. Chen]
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
CHANGING TIME AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Complaint Filed August 21, 2012
20
21
22
23
Subject to the approval of this Court, the parties hereby stipulate to a short extension of the
24
deadline for the parties’ Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 26(f) report pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 6 and Local
25
Rule 6-2.
26
The parties’ joint 26(f) report is currently due January 10, 2013 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
27
Proc. 26. Defendant U.S. Bank, N.A. (“U.S. Bank”) requests a 5 calendar-day extension, moving
28
the parties’ deadline to file their joint Rule 26(f) report to January 15, 2013. U.S. Bank requests this
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME– CASE NO. C12-04935 EMC
1
extension because it is in the process of gathering additional information pertinent to this case and
2
U.S. Bank’s outside legal counsel anticipates a meeting with U.S. Bank representatives on January
3
14, 2013 regarding issues that impact the parties’ joint statement. The parties will be able to file a
4
much more complete and informed joint statement once U.S. Bank has gathered additional
5
information and met with appropriate personnel.
6
Plaintiff Cynthia Brooks does not object to U.S. Bank’s request. Therefore, pursuant to
7
Local Rule 6-2, and because there is good cause for the modest extension of the deadline for the
8
parties’ Rule 26(f) report, the parties respectfully request the Court’s approval. SO STIPULATED:
9
Dated: January 9, 2013
By: /s/ Harvey Sohnen___
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Cynthia Brooks
11
12
13
Dated: January 9, 2013
14
By: /s/ Emilie C. Woodhead__
Attorneys for Defendant
U.S. BANK N.A.
15
16
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
17
21
S
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
22
n
M. Che
LI
ER
A
H
25
RT
24
dward
Judge E
NO
23
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
R NIA
20
Dated:
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
EDWARD M. CHEN
RT
U
O
19
1/11/13
FO
18
UNIT
ED
101 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-5802
Winston & Strawn LLP
10
LAW OFFICES OF SOHNEN & KELLY
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
26
27
28
1
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME – CASE NO. C12-04935 EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?