Norcal Homes Investment Group LLC v. Tamayo et al
Filing
10
Order by Hon. Samuel Conti Adopting 6 Report and Recommendations and Remanding Case.(sclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
10
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
9
11
12
13
14
15
NORCAL HOMES INVESTMENT GROUP,
LLC,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MINERVA S. TAMAYO, RICARDO TAMAYO, )
and DOES 1-X,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Case No. 12-4938-SC
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE
JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION AND
REMANDING CASE
16
On September 21, 2012, Defendants Minerva S. Tamayo and
17
Ricardo Tamayo (collectively, "Defendants") removed this unlawful
18
detainer action from California Superior Court to this Court.
19
No. 1.
20
Nathanael Cousins.
21
Cousins's jurisdiction.
22
Accordingly, on October 10, 2012, Judge Cousins issued an order
23
referring the case to the undersigned, along with a recommendation
24
that the case be remanded back to the state court where it was
25
filed.
26
Defendants at the time of issuance.
27
Rules of Civil Procedure 6(a), 6(d), and 5(b)(2)(E), Defendants had
28
until October 29, 2012 to object.
ECF
The case was assigned to United States Magistrate Judge
Neither party affirmatively consented to Judge
See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(c); Civ. L.R. 73-1.
ECF No. 6 ("R&R").
The R&R was electronically served on
Accordingly, under Federal
1
Defendants have not objected and the time to do so has
2
elapsed.
The Court, having reviewed the R&R and found it thorough
3
and well-reasoned, adopts it as the Court's order.
4
the Court REMANDS this case to the California Superior Court in and
5
for the County of Contra Costa.
Accordingly,
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
9
10
Dated:
November 13, 2012
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?