Xerox Consultant Company Inc v. Marin General Hospital Corporation

Filing 13

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 12 EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS filed by Xerox Consultant Company Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/13/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2012)

1 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
A Limited Liability Partnership
Including Professional Corporations
2
PHILIP F. ATKINS-PATTENSON, Cal. Bar No. 94901
3 ARTHUR J. FRIEDMAN, Cal. Bar No. 160867
SCOTT A. VIGNOS, Cal. Bar No. 277882
4 Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4109
5 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.434.3947
6 Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
7
8 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant
XEROX CONSULTANT COMPANY, INC.
9
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

(SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)

14
15 XEROX CONSULTANT COMPANY,
INC.,
16 a Michigan corporation,
Plaintiff,

17
18

v.

19 MARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL
CORPORATION,
20 a California non-profit public benefit
corporation,
21
Defendant.
22
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM.
23

Case No. C12-04948-EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING THE TIME
FOR XEROX CONSULTANT
COMPANY, INC. TO RESPOND TO
COUNTERCLAIMS OF MARIN
GENERAL HOSPITAL
CORPORATION

Hon. Edward M. Chen

24
25
26
27
28
SMRH:407676493.1

Case No. C12-04948-EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR XEROX
CONSULTANT COMPANY, INC. TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS OF MARIN
GENERAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION

1

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12 and this Court’s Civil Standing Order,

2 Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Xerox Consultant Company, Inc. (“Xerox”) and
3 Defendant and Counter-Claimant Marin General Hospital Corporation
4 (“MGHC”)(collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their counsel stipulate as follows:
5

WHEREAS, Xerox filed its Complaint in this matter on September 21, 2012 (Dkt. #

6 1);
7

WHEREAS, the Parties stipulated on October 19, 2012 that MGHC may respond to

8 the Complaint on or before November 5, 2012 (Dkt. # 8);
9

WHEREAS, the Parties further stipulated on November 5, 2012 to extend the

10 deadline for MGHC’s response to the Complaint to November 20, 2012 (Dkt. # 10);
11

WHEREAS, MGHC filed its Answer to Xerox’s Complaint and Counterclaims on

12 November 21, 2012 (Dkt. # 11);
13

WHEREAS, Xerox’s response to MGHC’s Counterclaims is due on December 12,

14 2012;
15

WHEREAS, on December 10, 2012 the Parties agreed to extend the deadline for

16 Xerox’s response to MGHC’s Counterclaims in order to provide additional time for them
17 to meet and confer regarding the content of MGHC’s Counterclaims;
18

WHEREAS, this requested extension will not materially impact the existing

19 schedule for the case.
20

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties through their respective counsel stipulate that

21 Xerox’s response to MGHC’s Counterclaims shall be due on or before December 20,
22 2012.
23 //
24 //
25 //
26 //
27 //
28 //
SMRH:407676493.1

Case No. C12-04948-EMC
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR XEROX
CONSULTANT COMPANY, INC. TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS OF MARIN
GENERAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION

1 Dated: December 11, 2012
2

SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP

3
By

4

/s/ Philip F. Atkins-Pattenson
PHILIP F. ATKINS-PATTENSON

5

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant
XEROX CONSULTANT COMPANY, INC.

6
7
8 Dated: December 11, 2012

ARCHER NORRIS

9
10

By

11

/s/ Douglas C. Straus
DOUGLAS C. STRAUS

12
Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Claimant
MARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL
CORPORATION

13
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17

December 13, 2012
DATED: ____________________

18

ard M.

NO

23

RT

24

dw
Judge E

ER

26

Chen

A

H

25

R NIA

22

LI

21

FO

UNIT
ED

S

20

RT
U
O

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
The Honorable Edward M. Chen
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DERED
SO OR
IT IS

19

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

27
28
SMRH:407676493.1

Case No. C12-04948-EMC
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR XEROX
CONSULTANT COMPANY, INC. TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS OF MARIN
GENERAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION

DECLARATION OF PHILIP F. ATKINS-PATTENSON

1
2

I, Philip F. Atkins-Pattenson, declare as follows:

3

1.

I am an attorney duly admitted to practice before this Court. I am a

4 partner with Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP, attorneys of record for Plaintiff
5 and Counter-Defendant XEROX CONSULTANT COMPANY, INC. (“Xerox”).
6

2.

If called as a witness, I could and would competently testify to the

7 matters set forth in this declaration.
8

3.

Xerox and Defendant and Counter-claimant Marin General Hospital

9 Corporation (“MGHC” and collectively, the “Parties”) stipulated on October 19, 2012 that
10 MGHC may respond to Xerox’s Complaint on or before November 5, 2012.
11

4.

The Parties further stipulated on November 5, 2012 to extend the

12 deadline for MGHC’s response to the Complaint to November 20, 2012.
13

5.

MGHC filed its Answer to Xerox’s Complaint and Counterclaims on

14 November 20, 2012.
15

6.

Xerox’s response to MGHC’s Counterclaims is due on December 12,

7.

On December, 10, 2012, MGHC’s counsel, Mr. Straus, and I agreed

16 2012.
17

18 to extend the deadline for Xerox’s response to the Counterclaims, subject to this Court’s
19 approval, in order to provide additional time for the Parties to meet and confer regarding
20 the content of MGHC’s Counterclaims.
21

8.

This requested extension will not materially impact the existing

22 schedule for the case.
23 //
24 //
25 //
26 //
27 //
28 //
SMRH:407676493.1

Case No. C12-04948-EMC
-4STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR XEROX
CONSULTANT COMPANY, INC. TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS OF MARIN
GENERAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION

1

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of

2 America that the foregoing is true and correct.
3

Executed December 11, 2012, at San Francisco, California.

4
5
6

/s/ Philip F. Atkins-Pattenson
Philip F. Atkins-Pattenson

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SMRH:407676493.1

Case No. C12-04948-EMC
-5STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR XEROX
CONSULTANT COMPANY, INC. TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS OF MARIN
GENERAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION

1

CERTIFICATION

2
3

I, Scott A. Vignos, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being

4 used to file this STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR XEROX CONSULTING
5 COMPANY, INC. TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS OF MARIN GENERAL
6 HOSPITAL. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Douglas C.
7 Straus has concurred in this filing.
8
9 Dated: December 11, 2012
10

SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP

11
By

12
13

/s/ Scott A. Vignos
SCOTT A. VIGNOS
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant
XEROX CONSULTANT COMPANY, INC.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SMRH:407676493.1

Case No. C12-04948-EMC
-6STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR XEROX
CONSULTANT COMPANY, INC. TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS OF MARIN
GENERAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION