France Telecom S.A. v. Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.
Filing
64
ORDER GRANTING AND DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATIONS by Judge Alsup terminating 58 Motion for Pro Hac Vice; terminating 59 Motion for Pro Hac Vice; denying 60 Motion for Pro Hac Vice; granting 61 Motion for Pro Hac Vice; granting 62 Motion for Pro Hac Vice; granting 63 Motion for Pro Hac Vice (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
FRANCE TELECOM SA,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. C 12-04967 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
12
MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR INC,
13
ORDER GRANTING AND
DENYING PRO HAC VICE
APPLICATIONS
Defendant.
/
14
15
The pro hac vice applications of Attorneys Huang, Rycroft, and Nimrod (Dkt. Nos.
16
61–63) are GRANTED, subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by
17
the attorneys must indicate appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon, and
18
communication with, local co-counsel designated in the applications will constitute notice to the
19
party.
20
The pro hac vice application of Attorney Dabney (Dkt. No. 60) is DENIED for failing to
21
specify membership in good standing of a United States Court or the highest court of another
22
State or the District of Columbia. Merely claiming membership of “the bar of New York” is
23
insufficient under the civil local rules. While the application fees does not need to be paid again,
24
the application cannot be processed until corrected forms are submitted.
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
Dated: February 25, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?