France Telecom S.A. v. Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.

Filing 64

ORDER GRANTING AND DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATIONS by Judge Alsup terminating 58 Motion for Pro Hac Vice; terminating 59 Motion for Pro Hac Vice; denying 60 Motion for Pro Hac Vice; granting 61 Motion for Pro Hac Vice; granting 62 Motion for Pro Hac Vice; granting 63 Motion for Pro Hac Vice (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 FRANCE TELECOM SA, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 No. C 12-04967 WHA Plaintiff, v. 12 MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR INC, 13 ORDER GRANTING AND DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATIONS Defendant. / 14 15 The pro hac vice applications of Attorneys Huang, Rycroft, and Nimrod (Dkt. Nos. 16 61–63) are GRANTED, subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by 17 the attorneys must indicate appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon, and 18 communication with, local co-counsel designated in the applications will constitute notice to the 19 party. 20 The pro hac vice application of Attorney Dabney (Dkt. No. 60) is DENIED for failing to 21 specify membership in good standing of a United States Court or the highest court of another 22 State or the District of Columbia. Merely claiming membership of “the bar of New York” is 23 insufficient under the civil local rules. While the application fees does not need to be paid again, 24 the application cannot be processed until corrected forms are submitted. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: February 25, 2013. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?