Velasquez v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 43

ORDER granting re 41 Request Appear Telephonically at the CMC filed by Union Pacific Railroad Company. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 12/6/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

Jacob D. Flesher, SBN: 210565
Naisha Covarrubias, SBN: 239499
FLESHER McKAGUE LLP
193 Blue Ravine Road, Suite 265
Folsom, CA 95630
Tele: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

WILLIE VELASQUEZ,

11
12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,
vs.
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY,
and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,

Case No.: C 12-05012 EDL
DEFENDANT UNION PACIFIC
RAILROAD COMPANY’S REQUEST
TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT
DECEMBER 13, 2013 CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;
ORDER

Defendants.

16

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-10(a), Defendant UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD

17

COMPANY (“Union Pacific”) requests permission to participate in the Case

18

Management Conference scheduled for December 13, 2013 at 8:30 a.m. in the

19

above-entitled Court by telephone. Union Pacific will be represented at the Case

20

Management Conference by Jacob D. Flesher, lead trial counsel in this case. Mr.

21

Flesher will be out of state on December 13 on another matter but is able to appear

22

telephonically for the conference at the scheduled date and time. Defense Counsel’s

23

direct line is [phone]. Defense Counsel will make arrangements with the

24

Court's teleconference services for the telephonic appearance.

25

Date: December 5, 2013

FLESHER McKAGUE LLP

26
27
28

By: ___/s/Jacob D. Flesher ________
JACOB D. FLESHER
Attorneys for Defendant
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
-1___________________________________________________________________________________
DEFENDANT’S REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

8

FO

LI

ER

H

7

RT

6

_____________________________________________
er
Honorable Charles R. Breyer R. Brey
Charles
Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

NO

5

DATED: December 6, 2013

A

4

D

RDERE

OO
IT IS S

R NIA

3

UNIT
ED

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

2

S

ORDER

1

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2___________________________________________________________________________________
DEFENDANT’S REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER