Synopsys Inc et al v. Mentor Graphics Corporation

Filing 22

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference is continued to February 22, 2013. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 4, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2013).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

CHRIS R. OTTENWELLER (STATE BAR NO. 73649)
[e-mail]
I. NEEL CHATTERJEE (STATE BAR NO. 173985)
[e-mail]
WILLIAM H. WRIGHT (STATE BAR NO. 161580)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff SYNOPSYS, INC., EVE-USA, INC., and
EMULATION AND VERIFICATION ENGINEERING, S.A.
GEORGE A. RILEY (STATE BAR NO. 118304)
[e-mail]
MARK E. MILLER (STATE BAR NO. 130200)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL SAPOZNIKOW (STATE BAR NO. 242640)
[e-mail]
ELIZABETH OFFEN-BROWN (STATE BAR NO. 279077)
[e-mail]
O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant MENTOR GRAPHICS CORP.
SEE ADDED PAGES FOR COMPLETE LIST OF COUNSEL
AND REPRESENTATION

18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

21
22
23

SYNOPSYS, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
EVE-USA, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and
EMULATION AND VERIFICATION
ENGINEERING, S.A., formed under the law
of France,

24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiffs,
v.
MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION, an
Oregon Corporation,

Case No.: CV 12 – 05025 MMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Date:
Time:
Dept:
Judge:

January 11, 2013
10:30 a.m.
Courtroom No. 7, 19th FL
Honorable Maxine M. Chesney

Defendant.

ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
SUTCLIFFE LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SILICON VALLEY

STIP & [PROP] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MGMT CONF
CASE NO. CV 12-05025-MMC

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiffs Synopsys, Inc., EVE-USA, Inc., and

2

Emulation and Verification Engineering, S.A. (collectively “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Mentor

3

Graphics Corp. (“Mentor Graphics”) jointly submit this stipulated request for an order

4

rescheduling the Case Management Conference in this action from January 11, 2013 to February

5

15, 2013, or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard.

6

WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed their Complaint in this action on September 27, 2012;

7

WHEREAS Plaintiffs served Mentor Graphics on December 21, 2012;

8

WHEREAS on December 20, 2012, this Court issued a Case Management Conference

9
10
11

Order that set a January 11, 2013 case management conference;
WHEREAS Mentor Graphics has not yet appeared in this action and is not required to
answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint until January 11, 2013;

12

WHEREAS the Parties have scheduled mediation for January 21, 2012; and

13

WHEREAS the requested continuance is the first request for an extension in this case of

14

any kind and will not affect any other deadline.

15

NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the Parties, through their

16

respective counsel of record, that the Case Management Conference be continued from January

17

11, 2013 to February 15, 2013, or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, and to grant a

18

corresponding extension to all deadlines associated therewith as set forth below.
The Parties will meet and confer regarding initial disclosures, early settlement,

19
20

ADR process selection, and discovery plan by January 25, 2013;
The Parties will file ADR Certification signed by Parties and Counsel by January

21
22
23
24

25, 2013;
The Parties will file either Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR
Phone Conference by January 25, 2013;

25

The Parties will file a joint case management statement by February 8, 2013;

26

The Parties will serve initial disclosures by February 8, 2013;

27
28
ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
SUTCLIFFE LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SILICON VALLEY

-1-

STIP & [PROP] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MGMT CONF
CASE NO. CV 12-05025-MMC

1
2

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

3
4
Dated: January 4, 2013
5
6

By: /s/ William H. Wright
WILLIAM H. WRIGHT
Attorneys for Plaintiffs SYNOPSYS, INC.
EVE-USA, INC. & EMULATION AND
VERIFICATION ENGINEERING, S.A.

7
8
9
10
11

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), counsel for Plaintiffs has obtained the concurrence
of Defendant’s counsel in the filing of this Stipulated Request.
Dated: January 4, 2013

12
13

By: /s/ Michael Sapoznikow
MICHAEL SAPOZNIKOW
Attorneys for Defendant
MENTOR GRAPHICS CORP.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The Case Management

Conferecence is continued to February 22, 2013.
January 4, 2013
DATED: _________________

_____________________________________
Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
United States District Judge

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
SUTCLIFFE LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SILICON VALLEY

-2-

STIP & [PROP] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MGMT CONF
CASE NO. CV 12-05025-MMC