Vega v. United States of America et al

Filing 15

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 01/10/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612) United States Attorney ALEX G. TSE (CSBN 152348) Chief, Civil Division JONATHAN U. LEE (CSBN 148792) Assistant United States Attorney 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102-3495 Telephone: (415) 436-6909 Facsimile: (415) 436-6748 jonathan.lee@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Federal Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION LEO VEGA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, ) PHILIP LEE, AND DOES 1 TO 10, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ____________________________________) 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL C 12-05038 TEH No. C 12-05038 TEH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1 Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(2), Plaintiff Leo Vega and 2 Defendants United States of America, United States Postal Service, and Philip Lee stipulate to 3 the dismissal with prejudice of Vega v. USA, et al., Northern District of California case number 4 C 12-05038 TEH. 5 6 7 The parties further stipulate that each party will bear its own costs. DATED: January 10, 2013 /s/ ANTHONY L. LABEL Attorney for Plaintiff Leo Vega 8 9 10 DATED: January 10, 2013 11 MELINDA HAAG United States Attorney /s/ JONATHAN U. LEE Attorneys for Defendants 12 13 _______________________________________ NO . He 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL C 12-05038 TEH 1 A H ER 20 FO helton E Judge T RT 19 R NIA HON. THELTON E. HENDERSON United States District Judgeerson nd 18 LI 17 01/10/2013 DATED: __________________ ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O 16 BASED ON THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: S 15 UNIT ED 14 N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?