Godoy v. Grounds
Filing
14
ORDER REOPENING ACTION; ORDER DISMISSING PETITION WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/7/13. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Certificate of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2013)
1
2
*E-Filed 5/7/13*
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
ENRIQUE A. GODOY,
13
14
15
16
17
No. C 12-5042 RS (PR)
Petitioner,
ORDER REOPENING ACTION;
v.
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION
WITH LEAVE TO AMEND
RANDY GROUNDS, Warden,
Respondent.
/
18
19
This federal habeas corpus action was dismissed because petitioner failed to pay the
20
filing fee. The fee has now been paid, and petitioner moves for relief from the judgment,
21
which the Court construes as a motion to reopen the action (Docket No. 13). So construed, it
22
is GRANTED. The action is hereby REOPENED, and the Clerk is directed to amend the
23
docket accordingly. The judgment (Docket No. 11), and the order of dismissal (Docket No.
24
10) are VACATED. The Clerk shall terminate Docket No. 13.
25
The petition, which contains two claims, is DISMISSED with leave to amend.
26
Petitioner’s Eighth Amendment claim regarding the conditions of confinement should be
27
brought in a civil rights, not a habeas, action. Accordingly, this claim is DISMISSED
28
No. C 12-5042 RS (PR)
ORDER REOPENING ACTION
1
without prejudice. If petitioner wishes to pursue this claim, he must bring it by way of a civil
2
rights action.
3
The second claim is DISMISSED with leave to amend. Petitioner claims that
4
respondent violated his due process rights in a rules violation report proceeding. It is not
5
clear whether petitioner lost time credits because of such proceeding. In his amended
6
petition, he must tell the Court whether he lost any time credits and, if he did lose credits,
7
how many.
8
9
Petitioner shall file an amended petition addressing the above-listed concerns on
or before June 15, 2013. The amended petition must include the caption and civil case
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
number used in this order (12-5042 RS (PR)) and the words AMENDED PETITION on the
11
first page. Because an amended petition completely replaces the previous petitions,
12
petitioner must include in his first amended petition all the claims he wishes to present,
13
including the ineffective assistance of counsel claim found cognizable above. Petitioner may
14
not incorporate material from the prior petition by reference. Failure to file an amended
15
petition in accordance with this order will result in dismissal of this action with prejudice for
16
failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
17
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: May 7, 2013
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
No. C 12-5042 RS (PR)
ORDER REOPENING ACTION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?