Eng v. Washington Mutual Bank, FA et al

Filing 29

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S RECENT SUBMISSION re 28 Opposition/Response to Motion,, filed by Martin Eng (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 No. C 12-05062 WHA MARTIN ENG, Plaintiff, ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S RECENT SUBMISSION v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA, J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE CO., QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORP., LA SALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOC., and DOES 1–20, inclusive, Defendants. / 14 15 At the case management conference and by order dated January 18, 2013 (Dkt. No. 25), 16 pro se plaintiff Martin Eng was ordered to file his sworn declaration under oath, attaching a copy 17 of the loan documents, deed of trust, and the notice of default referenced in the complaint. On 18 January 18, plaintiff filed a declaration to which he appended a number of documents “to comply 19 with the case management order,” including a bank loan statement. The bank loan statement 20 appended to the declaration is illegible (Dkt. No. 28 at p.8). Plaintiff should resubmit this 21 document, attached to a declaration identifying the document and stating under oath whether the 22 document is a true and correct copy thereof, due by NOON ON JANUARY 31. 23 Defendants may file a reply to plaintiff’s filings, due by NOON ON FEBRUARY 8. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: January 22, 2013. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?