Eng v. Washington Mutual Bank, FA et al

Filing 29

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S RECENT SUBMISSION re 28 Opposition/Response to Motion,, filed by Martin Eng (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2013)

1
2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
6
7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

No. C 12-05062 WHA

MARTIN ENG,
Plaintiff,

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S
RECENT SUBMISSION

v.
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA, J.P.
MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., CALIFORNIA
RECONVEYANCE CO., QUALITY LOAN
SERVICE CORP., LA SALLE BANK
NATIONAL ASSOC., and DOES 1–20,
inclusive,
Defendants.
/

14
15

At the case management conference and by order dated January 18, 2013 (Dkt. No. 25),

16

pro se plaintiff Martin Eng was ordered to file his sworn declaration under oath, attaching a copy

17

of the loan documents, deed of trust, and the notice of default referenced in the complaint. On

18

January 18, plaintiff filed a declaration to which he appended a number of documents “to comply

19

with the case management order,” including a bank loan statement. The bank loan statement

20

appended to the declaration is illegible (Dkt. No. 28 at p.8). Plaintiff should resubmit this

21

document, attached to a declaration identifying the document and stating under oath whether the

22

document is a true and correct copy thereof, due by NOON ON JANUARY 31.

23

Defendants may file a reply to plaintiff’s filings, due by NOON ON FEBRUARY 8.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated: January 22, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE