Lee v. The Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California et al

Filing 31

ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DATES SET FORTH IN THE ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADR DEADLINES re 28 Stipulation, filed by Patricia L Hastings, Palmer, Reifler & Associates, The Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California. Case Management Statement due by 1/24/2013. Case Management Conference set for 2/28/2013 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom F, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on January 11, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

DILLINGHAM & MURPHY, LLP
JOHN N. DAHLBERG (SBN 85122)
[e-mail]
DENNIS J. KELLY (SBN 191414)
[e-mail]
601 California Street, Suite 1900
San Francisco, CA 94108
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FACSIMILE: [phone]
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
THE PEP BOYS MANNY MOE & JACK
OF CALIFORNIA, a Pennsylvania Corporation;
PALMER, REIFLER & ASSOCIATES,
a Florida Professional Association, and
PATRICIA L. HASTINGS, an individual

6
7
8
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO

12
13

ANDREW LEE,

14

Plaintiff,

15
16
17
18
19

CASE NO. C12 5064 JSC

v.
THE PEP BOYS MANNY MOE & JACK OF
CALIFORNIA, a Pennsylvania Corporation;
PALMER, REIFLER & ASSOCIATES, a
Florida Professional Association; PATRICIA
L. HASTINGS, an individual; and DOES 1
through 100, inclusive,

[PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING
TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO
RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND DATES SET FORTH
IN THE ORDER SETTING INITIAL
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AND ADR DEADLINES

Defendants.

20
21
22

[PROPOSED] ORDER

23

The Court finds that there is good cause for extending the dates for the parties to

24

comply with the ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND

25

ADR DEADLINES and enlarging the time for Defendants THE PEP BOYS MANNY MOE &

26

JACK OF CALIFORNIA, PALMER, REIFLER & ASSOCIATES, P.A. and PATRICIA L.

27

HASTINGS to respond to the Second Amended Complaint, based on the following:

28

///
Page No. 1 – Case No. C12 5064 JSC [PROPOSED] Order Enlarging Time For Defendants To Respond To
Second Amended Complaint And Dates Set Forth In The Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference And
ADR Deadlines

1

The Second Amended Complaint was filed and served on December 27, 2013. Because

2

of the holiday season, as well as the absence of defense counsel, John Dahlberg, due to

3

personal matters, specifically attending to his gravely ill 91 year old mother, Mr. Dahlberg has

4

been unable to prepare a response to the Second Amended Complaint and is unable to comply

5

with the dates set forth in the Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR

6

Deadlines. Accordingly, the parties have stipulated to extending the time for Defendants to

7

respond to the Second Amended Complaint and the dates set forth in the Order Setting Initial

8

Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines by 14 days.

9

Having found good cause, IT IS SO ORDERED:

10

(1) that the deadline for Defendants to respond to the Second Amended Complaint,

11

currently due to be filed on January 10, 2013, is extended up to and including, January 24,

12

2013; and (2) that the dates set forth in the Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference

13

and ADR Deadlines are extended by fourteen days as follows:


14

the last day to meet and confer re: initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR

15

process selection, and discovery plan from January 10, 2013, to January 24,

16

2013;


17
18

the last date to file ADR Certification signed by Parties and Counsel from
January 10, 2013, to January 24, 2013;



19
20

the last day to file either Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR
Phone Conference from January 10, 2013, to January 24, 2013;



21

the last day to file Rule 26(f) Report, complete initial disclosure or state

22

objection in Rule 26(f) Report and file Case Management Statement per

23

Standing order re Contents of Joint Management Statement from January 10,

24

2013, to January 24, 2013;

25

//

26

//

27

//

28

//
Page No. 2 – Case No. C12 5064 JSC [PROPOSED] Order Enlarging Time For Defendants To Respond To
Second Amended Complaint And Dates Set Forth In The Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference And
ADR Deadlines



1

be continued to February 28, 2013, at 1:30 p.m.

3

11

S

ER

eline Sc

ot t C o

FO

c qu
J u d ge J a

H

10

RT

9

THE HON. JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
rley

NO

8

January 11, 2013

LI

7

Dated:

ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
___________________________________

A

6

UNIT
ED

5

RT
U
O

4

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

R NIA

2

the Initial Case Management Conference currently set for January 31, 2013 shall

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page No. 3 – Case No. C12 5064 JSC [PROPOSED] Order Enlarging Time For Defendants To Respond To
Second Amended Complaint And Dates Set Forth In The Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference And
ADR Deadlines