Emeco Industries, Inc. v. Restoration Hardware, Inc. et al

Filing 46

ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE ON PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. The hearing is continued from December 14, 2012 to January 11, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 11, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 JOHN W. SPIEGEL (SBN: 78935) John.Spiegel@mto.com MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 355 South Grand Avenue, Thirty-Fifth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560 Telephone: (213) 683-9100 Facsimile: (213) 687-3702 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 JONATHAN H. BLAVIN (SBN: 230269) Jonathan.Blavin@mto.com JESSE MAX CREED (SBN: 272595) Jesse.Creed@mto.com MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 560 Mission Street, 27th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 512-4000 Facsimile: (415) 512-4077 WESLEY E. OVERSON (SBN: 154737) WOverson@mofo.com JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (SBN: 161368) JTaylor@mofo.com NATHAN B. SABRI (SBN: 252216) NSabri@mofo.com JULIA D. KRIPKE (SBN: 267436) JKripke@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: 415.268.7000 Facsimile: 415.268.7522 Attorneys for Defendants RESTORATION HARDWARE, INC., GARY FRIEDMAN Attorneys for Plaintiff EMECO INDUSTRIES, INC. 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 EMECO INDUSTRIES, INC. Plaintiff, 16 17 v. 18 19 20 CASE NO. CV 12-05072 MMC STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON RESTORATION HARDWARE, INC., GARY FRIEDMAN, and DOES 1-10. Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON PRELIM. INJ.; [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. CV 12-05072 MMC 1 Plaintiff Emeco Industries, Inc. (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants Restoration Hardware, Inc. 2 and Gary Friedman (“Defendants”) hereby stipulate through their respective attorneys as 3 follows: 4 WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a motion for a preliminary injunction on October 10, 2012, 5 Dkt. No. 10; Defendants filed a response to the motion for a preliminary injunction on 6 November 16, 2012, Dkt. No. 26; Plaintiff filed a reply on November 30, 2012, Dkt. Nos. 37, 7 38, 39; and Defendants filed a motion for leave to file a surreply on December 7, 2012, Dkt. No. 8 42; 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 WHEREAS, Plaintiff intends to file an opposition and/or response to Defendants’ motion for leave to file a surreply; WHEREAS, the hearing date on Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction is currently set for December 14, 2012 at 9 a.m.; WHEREAS, the parties are presently in settlement discussions in an attempt to resolve their dispute without the Court’s intervention; WHEREAS, the parties jointly request a short continuance of the hearing date on 16 Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction to allow the parties to continue their settlement 17 discussions; 18 WHEREAS, the parties are aware that the typical day for civil law and motion hearings 19 for the Court is Friday, but counsel for Defendants has a child scheduled for surgery on Friday, 20 December 21, 2012; and 21 WHEREAS, the parties respectfully request that the hearing be on Thursday, December 22 20, 2012 at 9 a.m. or at a time thereafter that is convenient for the Court, or another date during 23 that week that is convenient for the Court besides Friday, December 21, 2012. 24 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that, subject to the Court’s 25 approval: 26 1. 27 The hearing on the preliminary injunction shall be continued until December 20, 2012 at 9 a.m. 28 -1- STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON PRELIM. INJ.; [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. CV 12-05072 MMC 1 2 Respectfully Submitted, Dated: December 7, 2012 Dated: December 7, 2012 /s/ Jonathan H. Blavin JONATHAN H. BLAVIN Jonathan.Blavin@mto.com /s/ Wesley E. Overson WESLEY E. OVERSON WOverson@mofo.com MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 560 Mission Street, 27th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 512-4000 Facsimile: (415) 512-4077 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: 415.268.7000 Facsimile: 415.268.7522 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff Emeco Industries, Inc. Attorneys for Defendants Restoration Hardware, Inc. and Gary Friedman 11 12 13 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Specifically, the hearing on the motion for a preliminary injunction is continued from December 14, 2012 to January 11, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. 14 15 DATED: December 11, 2012 16 HONORABLE MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 17 18 19 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 X.B. 20 I, Jonathan H. Blavin, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 21 Stipulation to Continue Initial Case Management Conference. In compliance with General Order 22 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Wesley E. Overson has concurred in this filing. 23 24 25 26 Dated: December 7, 2012 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP /s/ Jonathan H. Blavin JONATHAN H. BLAVIN Jonathan.Blavin@mto.com 27 28 -2- STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC; [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. CV 12-05072 MMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?