Emeco Industries, Inc. v. Restoration Hardware, Inc. et al

Filing 48

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE SURREPLY. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 12, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13
14

EMECO INDUSTRIES, INC.,

15

Plaintiff,

16
17

v.
RESTORATION HARDWARE, INC., GARY
FRIEDMAN, and Does 1-10,

Case No. 3:12-cv-5072 MMC
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO
FILE SURREPLY

18
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO FILE SURREPLY
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-5072 MMC
sf-3226329

1

2

Defendants have
Plaintiff filed a motion for administrative relief seeking leave to file a surreply. to respond
Plaintiff has filed opposition thereto. The Court having read and considered said submissions,
to criticisms of the survey of Mr. Hal Poret that Defendants submitted in opposition to the

3

preliminary injunction motion and purported misstatements of fact in Plaintiff’s reply.

4

Defendants’ motion is GRANTED. The Court will consider the proposed surreply filed as

5

Exhibit 1 and the supplemental declaration filed as Exhibit 2 to Defendants’ motion for

6

,
administrative relief. as well as the arguments set forth in plaintiff's response thereto.

1

7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
December 12, 2012
Dated: _______________________
10
11

______________________________
Hon. Maxine M. Chesney
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO FILE SURREPLY
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-5072 MMC
sf-3226329

2