De Sausa et al v. HSBC Bank U.S.A, N.A. et al
Filing
33
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 02/20/2014. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2014)
1
(Counsel listed on following page)
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
FERNANDO DE SAUSA and JESSICA
SHUM on behalf of themselves, in the interest
of the general public and as a Private Attorney
General,
15
16
17
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
Plaintiffs,
13
14
CASE NO. CV12-05081-TEH
vs.
HSBC BANK U.S.A., N.A.; HSBC USA,
INC.; and HSBC NORTH AMERICA
HOLDINGS, INC.,
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. CV12-05081-TEH
-1-
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
TOMAS E. MARGAIN (SB# 193555)
JUSTICE AT WORK LAW GROUP
84 W. Santa Clara St., Ste. 790
San Jose, CA 95113
Telephone: (408) 317-1100
Facsimile: (408) 351-0105
margainlaw@hotmail.com
RICHARD C. J. WAHNG (SB# 225672)
LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD WAHNG
152 Anza Street, Suite 201
Fremont, CA 94539
Telephone: (510) 490-4447
Facsimile: (510) 344-5755
rwahng@gmail.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
FERNANDO DE SAUSA, JESSICA SHUM and
10
PATRICIA CHUI
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
ENZO DER BOGHOSSIAN (SB# 211351)
PROSKAUER ROSE LLP
2049 Century Park East, 32nd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: (310) 284-4592
Facsimile: (310) 557-2193
ederboghossian@proskauer.com
Attorneys for Defendants
HSBC BANK U.S.A., N.A., HSBC USA, INC., and HSBC
NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS, INC.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. CV12-05081-TEH
-2-
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Plaintiffs Fernando De Sousa (“De Sousa”) and Jessica Shum (“Shum”) and opt-in
consenter Patricia Chui (“Chui”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”), and Defendants HSBC Bank USA,
N.A., HSBC USA Inc., and HSBC North America Holdings Inc. (collectively, “HSBC,” and
together with Plaintiffs, the “Parties”), acting through their counsel of record, hereby submit this
stipulation and [proposed] order to dismiss the matter with prejudice for the following reasons:
1.
After a full day of mediating before the Honorable William J. Cahill, HSBC and
all three individual Plaintiffs have successfully resolved their disputes.
2.
The parties have resolved their disputes privately and Plaintiffs wish to discontinue
this lawsuit with prejudice. The dismissal will not impact the right of any individuals other than
Plaintiffs.
SO STIPULATED.
12
13
14
15
DATED: February 19, 2014
TOMAS E. MARGAIN
JUSTICE AT WORK LAW GROUP
16
By:
17
/s/
TOMAS E. MARGAIN
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
FERNANDO DE SAUSA and JESSICA SHUM
18
19
ENZO DER BOGHOSSIAN
PROSKAUER ROSE LLP
20
21
DATED: February 19, 2014
22
By:
23
/s/
ENZO DER BOGHOSSIAN
Attorneys for Defendants
HSBC BANK U.S.A., N.A., HSBC USA, INC., and
HSBC NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS, INC.
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. CV12-05081-TEH
-3-
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
2
3
4
[Proposed] Order
Based on the above stipulation of counsel, this matter is dismissed with prejudice. All
deadlines are hereby terminated and the Clerk is instructed to close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
Dated: 02/20/2014
7
UNIT
ED
6
RT
U
O
5
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
________________________________________
THELTON E. HENDERSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
11
FO
A
H
ER
lton E. H
dge The
LI
Ju
RT
10
n
enderso
NO
9
R NIA
1
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. CV12-05081-TEH
-4-
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?