De Sausa et al v. HSBC Bank U.S.A, N.A. et al

Filing 33

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 02/20/2014. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2014)

Download PDF
1 (Counsel listed on following page) 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 FERNANDO DE SAUSA and JESSICA SHUM on behalf of themselves, in the interest of the general public and as a Private Attorney General, 15 16 17 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiffs, 13 14 CASE NO. CV12-05081-TEH vs. HSBC BANK U.S.A., N.A.; HSBC USA, INC.; and HSBC NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS, INC., Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. CV12-05081-TEH -1- STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 TOMAS E. MARGAIN (SB# 193555) JUSTICE AT WORK LAW GROUP 84 W. Santa Clara St., Ste. 790 San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (408) 317-1100 Facsimile: (408) 351-0105 margainlaw@hotmail.com RICHARD C. J. WAHNG (SB# 225672) LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD WAHNG 152 Anza Street, Suite 201 Fremont, CA 94539 Telephone: (510) 490-4447 Facsimile: (510) 344-5755 rwahng@gmail.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs FERNANDO DE SAUSA, JESSICA SHUM and 10 PATRICIA CHUI 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ENZO DER BOGHOSSIAN (SB# 211351) PROSKAUER ROSE LLP 2049 Century Park East, 32nd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (310) 284-4592 Facsimile: (310) 557-2193 ederboghossian@proskauer.com Attorneys for Defendants HSBC BANK U.S.A., N.A., HSBC USA, INC., and HSBC NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS, INC. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. CV12-05081-TEH -2- STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Plaintiffs Fernando De Sousa (“De Sousa”) and Jessica Shum (“Shum”) and opt-in consenter Patricia Chui (“Chui”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”), and Defendants HSBC Bank USA, N.A., HSBC USA Inc., and HSBC North America Holdings Inc. (collectively, “HSBC,” and together with Plaintiffs, the “Parties”), acting through their counsel of record, hereby submit this stipulation and [proposed] order to dismiss the matter with prejudice for the following reasons: 1. After a full day of mediating before the Honorable William J. Cahill, HSBC and all three individual Plaintiffs have successfully resolved their disputes. 2. The parties have resolved their disputes privately and Plaintiffs wish to discontinue this lawsuit with prejudice. The dismissal will not impact the right of any individuals other than Plaintiffs. SO STIPULATED. 12 13 14 15 DATED: February 19, 2014 TOMAS E. MARGAIN JUSTICE AT WORK LAW GROUP 16 By: 17 /s/ TOMAS E. MARGAIN Attorneys for Plaintiffs FERNANDO DE SAUSA and JESSICA SHUM 18 19 ENZO DER BOGHOSSIAN PROSKAUER ROSE LLP 20 21 DATED: February 19, 2014 22 By: 23 /s/ ENZO DER BOGHOSSIAN Attorneys for Defendants HSBC BANK U.S.A., N.A., HSBC USA, INC., and HSBC NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS, INC. 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. CV12-05081-TEH -3- STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE 2 3 4 [Proposed] Order Based on the above stipulation of counsel, this matter is dismissed with prejudice. All deadlines are hereby terminated and the Clerk is instructed to close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. S Dated: 02/20/2014 7 UNIT ED 6 RT U O 5 S DISTRICT TE C TA ________________________________________ THELTON E. HENDERSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 11 FO A H ER lton E. H dge The LI Ju RT 10 n enderso NO 9 R NIA 1 N F D IS T IC T O R C 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. CV12-05081-TEH -4- STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?