Crosthwaite et al v. DJK Construction Inc
Filing
30
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 28 STIPULATION. Judgment shall be and is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant in the amount of $15,663.26. The calendar in this matter is vacated, and the Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/01/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2013)
Muriel B. Kaplan, Esq. (SBN124607)
1 Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509)
SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION
2 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110
San Francisco, CA 94104
3 (415) 882-7900
(415) 882-9287 – Facsimile
4 mkaplan@sjlawcorp.com
mstafford@sjlawcorp.com
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
F. G. CROSTHWAITE, et al., as Trustees of
the OPERATING ENGINEERS’ HEALTH
AND WELFARE TRUST FUND FOR
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, et al.
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO
STIPULATION
Plaintiffs,
v.
DJK CONSTRUCTION, INC., a California
corporation,
Defendant.
15
16
Case No.: C12-5088 WHO
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, that Judgment may be
17 entered in the within action in favor of the Plaintiffs F.G. CROSTHWAITE, et al. (collectively
18 “Plaintiffs” or “Trust Funds”) and against Defendant DJK CONSTRUCTION, INC., a California
19 corporation (“Defendant”), as follows:
20
1.
Defendant
entered
into
a
valid
Collective
Bargaining
Agreement
with
21 the Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3 of the International Union of Operating Engineers,
22 AFL-CIO (hereinafter "Bargaining Agreement"). This Bargaining Agreement has continued in full
23 force and effect to the present time.
24
25
26
27
2.
Defendant has become indebted to the Plaintiffs as follows:
2/12-4/12 Contributions
$8,933.82
10% Interest on 5/11, 12/11-4/12
$961.44
Subtotal:
Attorneys’ Fees (through 8/11/13)
Costs of Suit (through 8/11/13)
TOTAL
28
$9,895.26
$5,107.00
$661.00
$15,663.26
-1-
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION
Case No.: C12-5088 WHO
G:\WHOALL\_CV\2012\2012_05088_Crosthwaite_v_DJK_Construction_Inc\12-cv-05088-WHO-Proposed_Judgment_With_Atty_Signature.docx
1
2
3.
DALTON EUGENE DE ORNELLAS acknowledges that he is the CEO/President of
3 Defendant DJK CONSTRUCTION, INC., a California corporation, and is authorized to enter this
4 Stipulation.
5
4.
This Stipulation is limited to the agreement between the parties with respect to the
6 specified delinquent contributions and related sums enumerated herein, owed by Defendant to the
7 Plaintiffs, and does not in any manner relate to withdrawal liability claims, if any.
5.
8
Should any provision of this Stipulation be declared or determined by any court of
9 competent jurisdiction to be illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, the legality, validity, and
10 enforceability of the remaining parts, terms or provisions shall not be affected thereby and said
11 illegal, unenforceable or invalid part, term, or provision shall be deemed not to be part of this
12 Stipulation.
13
6.
This Stipulation contains all of the terms agreed by the parties and no other
14 agreements have been made. Any changes to this Stipulation shall be effective only if made in
15 writing and signed by all parties hereto.
16
7.
This Stipulation may be executed in any number of counterparts and by facsimile,
17 each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which shall constitute the same instrument.
18
8.
The Parties herein stipulate that Judgment shall be and is hereby entered in favor of
19 Plaintiffs and against Defendant in the amount of $15,663.26.
20 / / /
21 / / /
22 / / /
23 / / /
24 / / /
25 / / /
26 / / /
27 / / /
28
-2JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION
Case No.: C12-5088 WHO
G:\WHOALL\_CV\2012\2012_05088_Crosthwaite_v_DJK_Construction_Inc\12-cv-05088-WHO-Proposed_Judgment_With_Atty_Signature.docx
1 ///
///
2
9.
3
4
5
All parties represent and warrant that they have consulted with counsel of their own
choosing in connection with entering this Stipulation under the terms and conditions set forth
herein, and that they enter into this Stipulation voluntarily.
6 Dated: October 29, 2013
DJK CONSTRUCTION, INC., a California
corporation
7
By:
8
9
/S/
Dalton Eugene DeOrnellas,
its RMO/CEO/President
10
11
12 Dated: October 30, 2013
SALTZMAN & JOHNSON
LAW CORPORATION
13
By:
14
15
/S/
Muriel B. Kaplan, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
16
17 APPROVED AS TO FORM.
18
19
By:
Dated: October 29, 2013
/S/
Rodney Mariani, Esq. (SBN 69918)
Attorney for DJK Construction, Inc.
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the calendar in this matter is vacated, and
22 that the Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter.
23 Dated: November 1, 2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
24
25
26
27
28
-3JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION
Case No.: C12-5088 WHO
G:\WHOALL\_CV\2012\2012_05088_Crosthwaite_v_DJK_Construction_Inc\12-cv-05088-WHO-Proposed_Judgment_With_Atty_Signature.docx
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?