McCoy v. United States of America
ORDER Administratively Closing Case and Transferring Documents to Case Number C12-3821 TEH. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 11/05/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2012)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DANNY L. MCCOY,
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
No. C-12-5096 TEH (PR)
ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING
CASE AND TRANSFERRING DOCUMENTS
TO CASE NUMBER C-12-3821 TEH
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
In this case, Plaintiff Danny L. McCoy, a federal prisoner
presently incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution (FCI)
in Lompoc, California, files evidence pertaining to his complaint in
case number C 12-3841 TEH regarding an incident that occurred on
January 27, 2011, when he was incarcerated at the FCI in Dublin,
Here, Plaintiff files medical evidence showing that his
injuries are the result of the incident on January 27, 2011 and not
from a previous slip and fall incident on September 18, 2009.
However, Plaintiff filed the new evidence with a cover sheet
indicating it was a new complaint and, thus, the clerk opened a new
case and assigned it a new case number.
Because Plaintiff is submitting evidence supporting his
claim in case number C 12-3841 TEH, this information should have
been filed in that case and a new case should not have been opened.
Plaintiff is advised to include the correct case number, C 12-3841
TEH, on all documents he files relating to his claim arising from
the January 27, 2011 incident.
Therefore, the clerk is ordered to administratively close
this case and file the documents attached to Plaintiff’s complaint
in case number C 12-3841 TEH.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
THELTON E. HENDERSON
United States District Judge
G:\PRO-SE\TEH\CR.12\McCoy v. US- 12-5096 Close Case.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?