Shellock v. Biter

Filing 8

ORDER (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 6/13/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

GENESIS SHELLOCK,

9

Petitioner,

10
11

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

12

No. C 12-5121 SI (pr)
ORDER

v.
M. D. BITER, warden,
Respondent.
/

13
14

Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss the petition for writ of habeas corpus on the

15

ground that it is time-barred. Petitioner has filed an opposition to the motion, and attached to

16

his opposition a declaration of attorney Tutti Hacking. The declaration is unsigned, however,

17

and cannot be considered as evidence in its present form. If petitioner wants the court to

18

consider the declaration, he must file and serve a signed copy of it within thirty days of the date

19

of this order. Respondent may file any reply in support of his motion to dismiss within fifteen

20

days of the filing of the signed copy of the declaration.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: June 13, 2013
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge