Lambertson v. Lewis et al
Filing
60
ORDER TO REOPEN CASE AND SEND PLAINTIFF A SUBPOENA. Signed by Judge James Donato on 6/1/16. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
JOHN D. LAMBERTSON,
7
Plaintiff,
8
ORDER TO REOPEN CASE AND
SEND PLAINTIFF A SUBPOENA
v.
9
G. D. LEWIS,
10
Defendant.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 12-cv-05122-JD
12
Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
13
14
Plaintiff alleged that three Doe defendants and the warden failed to protect him from an assault by
15
other inmates on February 14, 2012. The case was dismissed for failure to state a claim and
16
plaintiff filed an appeal. The Ninth Circuit reversed and ordered the claims to continue against the
17
Doe defendants and remanded the case for further proceedings.1 The Doe defendants have not
18
been identified or served.
Although the use of “John Doe” to identify a defendant is not favored in the Ninth Circuit,
19
20
see Gillespie v. Civiletti, 629 F.2d 637, 642 (9th Cir. 1980); Wiltsie v. Cal. Dep’t of Corrections,
21
406 F.2d 515, 518 (9th Cir. 1968), situations may arise where the identity of alleged defendants
22
cannot be known prior to the filing of a complaint. In such circumstances, the plaintiff should be
23
given an opportunity through discovery to identify the unknown defendants, unless it is clear that
24
discovery would not uncover their identities or that the complaint should be dismissed on other
25
grounds. See Gillespie, 629 F.2d at 642; Velasquez v. Senko, 643 F. Supp. 1172, 1180 (N.D. Cal.
26
1986).
27
1
28
The Ninth Circuit did not consider the claim against the warden because plaintiff failed to
reallege his claim against this defendant in the third amended complaint.
1
Plaintiff must provide the identities of the Doe defendants. Plaintiff may seek such
2
information through the California Public Records Act or any other means available such as
3
seeking reports from his central file concerning the incident. Plaintiff may also use a Court
4
subpoena which the Court will provide with instruction below. If plaintiff seeks to use the
5
subpoena he must return it the Court as soon as possible.
CONCLUSION
6
7
1. The Clerk shall REOPEN this case.
8
2. Plaintiff shall provide the identities of the defendants within fifty-six days (56) of
9
10
service of this Order.
3. As a pro se litigant, plaintiff needs the Court’s Clerk to issue a subpoena. Fed. R. Civ.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
P. 45(a)(3). Therefore, the Clerk shall send to plaintiff a blank records subpoena form for
12
plaintiff to fill out and return to the Court so that the Clerk may issue the subpoena and the
13
Marshal may serve it on the subpoenaed party. Plaintiff needs to fill in all of the necessary
14
information, but must leave the signature line blank so that the Clerk may sign it.
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 1, 2016
17
18
JAMES DONATO
United States District Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
JOHN D. LAMBERTSON,
Case No. 12-cv-05122-JD
Plaintiff,
5
v.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
6
7
G. D. LEWIS,
Defendant.
8
9
10
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
That on June 1, 2016, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing
said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
16
17
18
John D. Lambertson ID: V-92821
California State Prison-Corcoran
P.O. Box 3466
Corcoran, CA 93212
19
20
21
Dated: June 1, 2016
22
23
Susan Y. Soong
Clerk, United States District Court
24
25
26
27
By:________________________
LISA R. CLARK, Deputy Clerk to the
Honorable JAMES DONATO
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?