Nada Pacific Corporation v. Power Engineering and Manufacturing, Ltd

Filing 9

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO FILE ANSWER TO COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 11/6/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6

MATTHEW P. GUICHARD, SBN 107450
WILLIAM L. PORTELLO, SBN 166845
CHRISTOPHER K. TENG, SBN 176431
GUICHARD, TENG & PORTELLO, A.P.C.
Sutter Square
1800 Sutter Street, Suite 730
Concord, California 94520
[phone]
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
Attorneys for Defendant,
POWER ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING, LTD.

7
8
9
10
(

D. MICHAEL SCHOENFELD, SBN 102332
MURPHY AUSTIN ADAMS SCHOENFELD LLP
304 “S” Street
Sacramento, California 95811
[phone]
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:

11
12

Attorneys for NADA PACIFIC CORPORATION

13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

.

14
‘V)

i.
c’,

16

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

17

NADA PACIFIC CORPORATION, a
California corporation,

18

Plaintiff,

.

H

19
20
21
22

—

SAN FRANCISCO

Case No. C12-5133 JCS
STIPULATION TO FILE ANSWER TO
COMPLAINT

v.
POWER ENGINEERING AND
MANUFACTURING, LTD., an Iowa
corporation,

Complaint Filed: October 3, 2012

Defendant.

23
24

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the parties, plaintiff NADA PACIFIC

25

CORPORATION (“Plaintiff’) and defendant POWER ENGiNEERING AND

26

MANUFACTURING, LTD. (“Defendant”), by and through their attorneys of record, that

27

Defendant may have one week extension of time, or upto and including November 13, 2012, in

28

which to file the Answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint on file in this matter.
STIPULATION ‘ID FILE ANSWER TO COMPLAINI
USDC’ NO, CI 2S 133 iC’S

1
2
3

Said extension is solely for the purpose of filing an answer, and that no extension is
available for purposes of a motion, whether l2b6, challenge to venue, challenge to jurisdiction,
etc.

4
SO STIPULATED.

5
6
7

Dated:

1)

GUICHARD TENG & PORTELLO, A.P.C.

8
9
10

c)

MATTHEW P. GJCHARD
WILLIAM L>YRTELLO
CHRISTOPHER K. TENG
Attorys for Defendant POWER
ENGINEERING AND
MANUFACTURING, LTD.

Q

11

o
.-

Uw

.—

0—
.—

0

12
13
14

0

15

I

16
17
18

BY4
MICHAEL SCHOENFELD
Attorneys for Plaintiff NADA PACIFIC
S DISTRICCORPORATION
TC
TE

19
20

ER

R NIA

seph C.

Spero

FO

Judge Jo

H

25

RT

24

NO

23

ERED

O ORD
IT IS S

LI

22

Dated: November 6, 2012

RT
U
O

21

TA

A

H

JSTIN ADAMS SCHOENFELD LLP

MU

Dated:

S

1.)

UNIT
ED

v

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

26
27
28
-2STIPULATION TO FILE ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
USDC NO, CU-s 33 JCS

I
2
3
4

PROOF OF SERVICE
NADA Pacfic Corp. v. Power Engineering and Manufacturing, Ltd.
USDC Northern, Case No. C 12-5 133 JCS
I am a citizen of the United States. My business address is 1800 Sutter Street, Suite 730,
Concord, California, 94520. I am employed in the county of Contra Costa where this service
occurs. I am over the age of 18 years, and not a party to the within cause. On the date herein
below, following ordinary business practice, I served the following document(s):

5
STIPULATION TO FILE ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
6
7
8
9

I
(BY MAIL) I am readily familiar with my employer’s normal business practice for
collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the U.S. Postal Service, and that
practice is that correspondence is deposited with the U.S. Postal Service the same day as the day
of collection in the ordinary course of business. I caused this date envelope(s) containing said
document(s), with postage thereon fully prepaid and addressed to the offices of the addressee(s)
listed below, to be placed in the United States mail at Concord, California, according to ordinary
business practices.

10
11
-

U
(BY FAX) I transmitted via facsimile said document(s) to the offices of the
addressee(s)listed below on this date before 5:00 p.m.

..

12
.

i

13

U
(BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY) I caused this date envelope(s) containing said
document(s) addressed to the addressee(s) listed below to be delivered to an overnight delivery
carrier with delivery fees provided for.

.3

14
15
..

16

—

U
(BY PERSONAL SERVICE) I arranged for a messenger to deliver on this date before
5:00 p.m., a true and correct copy of said document(s) to be personally served on the party(ies)
listed below:
U
(BY VIA ELECTRONIC SERVICE-(E-MAIL)) I transmitted via e-mail said
document(s) to the offices of the e-mail addresses listed below on this date before 5:00 p.m.

17
Attorneys for NADA PACIFIC CORP.
18
19
20
21
22

D. Michael Schoenfeld, Esq.
MURPHY AUSTIN ADAMS SCHOENFELD LLP
304 “5” Street
Sacramento, California 95811
[phone]
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
Email: mschoenfe1d(murphyaustin.com

23
24
25
26
27

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above
is true and correct. Executed on November 5, 2012at Concord, California.
I served the above document(s) upon the instruction f a member of
California.
arnozStat0f
Jh

28
PROOF OF SERVICE

a