Cassano v. Johnson et al
Filing
67
ORDER GRANTING 57 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; VACATING HEARING; AND REQUESTING STATUS REPORT.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2014).
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
GARY CASSANO,
No. C 12-05144 WHA
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
VACATING HEARING; AND
REQUESTING STATUS REPORT
M. JOHNSON and W. ROGERS,
Defendants.
/
This is a Section 1983 action alleging violations of plaintiff Gary Cassano’s Eighth
17
Amendment rights. Cassano is a California state prison inmate who alleges that defendant M.
18
Johnson, a non-incarcerated kitchen employee, kicked a steel kitchen door that hit Cassano in the
19
head. Cassano further alleges that defendant W. Rogers, a supervising cook at Cassano’s
20
correctional facility, failed to separate and protect him from Johnson.
21
Now, Rogers seeks summary judgment on Cassano’s remaining claim as to him — that
22
Rogers was deliberately indifferent to Cassano’s safety (Dkt. No. 57). In response, Cassano’s
23
counsel have filed a statement of non-opposition: “Based upon Babcock vs. White, 102 F.3d 267
24
(7th Cir. 1996), [p]laintiff Gary Cassano does not oppose W. Roger’s Motion for Summary
25
Judgment” (Dkt. No. 66). Rogers’ motion for summary judgment is therefore GRANTED. The
26
hearing previously set for November 20, 2014, is hereby VACATED.
27
28
1
This leaves Johnson as the remaining defendant here. As such, Johnson’s counsel will
2
submit a status report indicating whether his case can be resolved by summary judgment or by
3
some other dispositive motion. This status report is due by 4 PM ON NOVEMBER 18, 2014.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: November 4, 2014.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?