Stewart v. Gogo, Inc.
Filing
90
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 89 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to File Amended Answer to Second Amended Complaint and Withdraw Motion to Strike filed by Gogo, Inc.. Motion #88 terminated. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/14/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2014) Modified on 4/14/2014 (bpf, COURT STAFF).
5
Patrick D. Robbins (SBN 152288)
Mikael A. Abye (SBN 233458)
SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 3800
San Francisco, CA 94111-5994
Telephone: 415.616.1100
Facsimile: 415.616.1199
Email: probbins@shearman.com
mabye@shearman.com
6
Attorneys for Defendant GOGO INC.
1
2
3
4
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
13
JAMES STEWART, JOEL MILNE, AND
JOSEPH STRAZZULLO, On Behalf of
Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated,
Plaintiff,
Courtroom:
Judge:
Hearing Date:
Time:
v.
15
17
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO FILE AMENDED ANSWER
TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
AND WITHDRAW MOTION TO
STRIKE
Defendant.
14
16
Case No.: 3:12-cv-5164-EMC
GOGO Inc.,
5
Hon. Edward M. Chen
March 28, 2013
1:30 pm
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
WHEREAS, on February 28, 2014 Defendant Gogo, Inc. (“Gogo”) filed its Answer to the
Second Amended Complaint [Dkt. No. 85] (the “Answer”);
WHEREAS, on March 28, 2014 Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Strike Defendant’s Affirmative
Defenses [Dkt. No. 88] (the “Motion”);
WHEREAS Plaintiffs and Gogo (collectively “the Parties”) have met and conferred
concerning the Plaintiffs’ Motion and Gogo’s Answer;
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE AMENDING ANSWER TO SAC
1
Case No. 3:12-cv-5164-EMC
312074
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED among the Parties that:
2
1. Plaintiffs withdraw their Motion without prejudice; and
3
2. Gogo will amend its Answer with respect to its affirmative defenses on or before May 9,
4
5
2014.
Dated: April 11, 2014
SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP
6
/s/ Mikael A. Abye
Mikael A. Abye
By:
7
8
Attorneys for Defendant GOGO INC.
9
10
Dated: April 11, 2014
THE KATRIEL LAW FIRM
11
THE MEHDI FIRM
12
KRAUSE KALFAYAN BENINK &
SLAVENS LLP
13
/s/ Roy A. Katriel
Roy A. Katriel
By:
14
15
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
4/14
Dated: ________________________2014
___________________________________
United States ard M. CJudge
District hen
dge Edw
Ju
25
FO
A
H
22
24
ER
LI
RT
21
23
VED
APPRO
NO
20
S
UNIT
ED
18
RT
U
O
ORDER
17
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
R NIA
16
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
ATTESTATION
I, Mikael A. Abye, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE AMENDED ANSWER TO SECOND
AMENED COMPLAINT AND WITHDRAW MOTION TO STRIKE. In compliance with Civil
Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Roy A. Katriel has concurred in this filing.
26
27
/s/ Mikael A. Abye
Mikael A. Abye
Dated: April 11, 2014
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE AMENDING ANSWER TO SAC
2
Case No. 3:12-cv-5164-EMC
312074
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?