Patterson v. Byrd et al

Filing 36

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 3/4/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

ANDRE PATTERSON,
Plaintiff,

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

No. C -12-05203(EDL)
ORDER DISMISSING CASE

v.
CHARLES BYRD, et al.
Defendants.

/

13
14

On October 9, 2013, Pro se Plaintiff Andre Patterson filed a complaint against Defendants

15

Charles Byrd, Community Housing Partnership and Michael Rossoff asserting claims for violation

16

of the Civil Rights Act (“CRA”), the Rehabilitation Act, the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”) and the

17

Americans With Disabilities Act (“ADA”) based on what he alleged was an unlawful eviction. All

18

parties have consented to the jurisdiction of this Magistrate Court. On February 14, 2013, this Court

19

granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint but granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended

20

complaint by no later than February 28, 2013. No amended complaint has been timely filed, and the

21

complaint is therefore dismissed with prejudice.

22

The Court also notes that all mail sent by the Court to Plaintiff since December 18, 2012 has

23

been returned as undeliverable. Plaintiff has not provided any updated contact information to the

24

Court as required by Civil Local Rule 3-11(a), and the Court has no other contact information for

25

Plaintiff. Dismissal is therefore also appropriate pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-11(b).

26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28

Dated: March 4, 2013
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
United States Chief Magistrate Judge