LOWE v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
Filing
118
ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT STATUS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 5/8/2014. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2014)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
BEVERLY JAMES LOWE,
Case No. 12-cv-05227-CRB (JSC)
Plaintiff.
8
v.
ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT STATUS
9
10
GENERAL DYNAMICS,
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
This action has been referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero and Magistrate Judge
14
Jacqueline Scott Corley for settlement purposes. The remaining parties in this case are ordered to
15
do the following:
16
1.
17
Plaintiff(s) shall make a demand in writing for settlement to each defendant. If
Plaintiff has already done so, Plaintiff shall reiterate his/her demand or make a new demand.
18
2.
Each defendant shall respond in writing to Plaintiff’s demand.
19
3.
Following the exchange of offers and counteroffers, the parties shall negotiate in a
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
good faith attempt to resolve the claims without further court intervention.
4.
If the case is not resolved by the negotiations, each party in each case shall prepare
Settlement Conference Statements which must be LODGED with Judge Spero’s and Judge
Corley’s Chambers (NOT electronically filed) on or before June 6, 2014. Please 3-hole punch the
document at the left side. Each party shall also submit their Settlement Conference Statement in
.pdf format and email their statement to JCSPO@cand.uscourts.gov and
JSCPO@cand.uscourts.gov.
5.
Upon the Court’s review of the Statements, the Court will contact the parties
regarding a date for an in-person settlement conference.
1
2
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 8, 2014
______________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States Magistrate Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?