Boyens v. Hartford Life Insurance Company et al
Filing
19
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 18 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER (STIPULATION TO BRIEFLY CONTINUE 3/7/13 CMC UNTIL AFTER MEDIATION DUE TO COUNSEL'S MEDICAL INJURY, OR ALTERNATIVELY, FOR APPEARANCE BY OTHER DEFENSE COUNSEL AT CMC) filed b y Hartford Life Insurance Company, Group Long Term Disability Plan for Employees of the First America Corporation Case Management Statement due by 4/18/2013. Case Management Conference set for 4/25/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/4/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCSICO DIVISION
10
11
ELIZABETH BOYENS,
12
Plaintiff,
Case No. C12-05242 EMC
13
v.
14
HARTFORD LIFE AND
ACCIDENT INSURANCE
COMPANY AND THE FIRST
AMERICA CORPORATION
GROUP LIFE, MEDICAL,
DENTAL, DISABILITY BENEFITS
TRUST,
15
16
17
18
CURRENT CMC
DATE: March 7, 2013
TIME: 9:00 a.m.
Defendants.
19
20
21
(PROPOSED) ORDER RE
STIPULATION TO BRIEFLY
CONTINUE 3/7/13 CMC UNTIL
AFTER 4/8/13 MEDIATION DUE TO
COUNSEL’S MEDICAL
UNAVAILABILITY, OR
ALTERNATIVELY, FOR
APPEARANCE BY OTHER
DEFENSE COUNSEL AT CMC
PROPOSED DATE: April 18, 2013
___________________________________
22
Having reviewed the Stipulation to Continue the Case Management
23
Conference set for March 7, 2013, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby
24
4/25/13
continues the Case Management Conference to _______________ at 9:00
_______a.m.
25
UNIT
ED
S
Dated: ________________
RT
U
O
RT
2329784_1
NO
LA #4847-1205-8899 v1
-1dward
Judge E
C12-05242 EMC
(PROPOSED) ORDER RE STIP. TO CONT. CMC OR
Chen
M.ALTERNATIVELY, FOR APPEARANCE BY OTHER
DEFENSE COUNSEL
FO
28
O ORD D
IT IS S
DIFIE
AS MO
R NIA
UNITED STATESED
ER DISTRICT JUDGE
27
H
LI
26
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
_________________________________________
3/4/13
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?