Ruff v. Del Monte Corporation et al

Filing 30

ORDER GRANTING SECOND UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO REPLY; DENYING AS MOOT FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 2/21/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2013)

Case3:12-cv-05251-JSW Document29-4 Filed02/21/13 Page1 of 2

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

MAXINE S. RUFF, on behalf of herself and
all others similarly situated,

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
and
)
)
DEL MONTE CORPORATION d/b/a
)
DEL MONTE FOODS and MILO’s
)
KITCHEN, LLC
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
______________________________________ )

Case No. C 12-5251-JSW
Hon. Jeffrey S. White
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SECOND UNOPPOSED
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
EXTEND TIME TO REPLY TO
PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
TRANSFER OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT
[L.R. 7-11]
Hearing on Motion to Transfer/Dismiss
DATE: April 12, 2013
TIME: 9:00 a.m.

AND ORDER DENYING AS MOOT FIRST
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

28

1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SECOND UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO
REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO TRANSFER OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT – CASE NO. 12-cv-05251-JSW

Case3:12-cv-05251-JSW Document29-4 Filed02/21/13 Page2 of 2

1
2

FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

3
4

1) Defendants Del Monte Corporation and Milo’s Kitchen, LLC are granted a one week

5

extension to file a Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Transfer or, in the

6

Alternative, Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint; and

7

2) Defendants have up to and including March 1, 2013 to file a Reply to Plaintiff’s

8

Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Transfer or, in the Alternative, Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint.

9
10
11
12

Dated: February 21, 2013
Hon. Judge Jeffrey S. White
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

28

2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SECOND UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO
REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO TRANSFER OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT – CASE NO. 12-cv-05251-JSW