Qadome et al v. Celcite Management Solutions, LLC et al

Filing 7

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS AT&T MOBILITY LLC AND CELCITE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC, TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 11/5/2012. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2012)

M ILLER L AW G ROUP

A P RO F E SSIO NAL C O RPO RATIO N
C ALIF O RNIA

1 Mark L. Venardi (SBN 173140)
Martin Zurada (SBN 218235)
2 VENARDI ZURADA LLP
700 Ygnacio Valley Road, Suite 300
3 Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Tel. [phone]
4
Fax [phone]
5 Attorney for Plaintiffs
MAHER QADOME, SAQIB HUSSAIN and
6 HASSAN ALI KHAN
7 Lisa C. Hamasaki (SBN 197628)
Donna M. Rutter (SBN 145704)
8 Lindsay E. Hutner (SBN 238998)
MILLER LAW GROUP
9 A Professional Corporation
111 Sutter Street, Suite 700
10 San Francisco, CA 94104
11 Tel. [phone]
Fax [phone]
12 Attorneys for Defendant
AT&T MOBILITY LLC
13
Michelle Rapoport (SBN 247459)
14 FORD & HARRISON LLP
350 South Grand Ave., Suite 2300
15 Los Angeles, CA 90071
Tel. [phone]
16 Fax [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
17
CELCITE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LLC
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
MAHER QADOME, an individual; SAQIB
Case No.: 12-5253 LB
21 HASSAIN, an individual; and HASSAN ALI
ECF No.: 3:12-cv-05253-LB
KHAN, an individual,
22
Plaintiffs,
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR
23
DEFENDANTS AT&T MOBILITY LLC AND
v.
CELCITE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS,
24
LLC, TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING
25 CELCITE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC, TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
a Delaware limited liability company; AT&T
ORDER
26 MOBILITY LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company; and DOES 1-100,
27
Complaint filed: October 11, 2012
Defendants.
28
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT - Case No.: C 12-5253 LB

1

WHEREAS, on October 11, 2012, Plaintiffs MAHER QADOME, SAQIB

2 HASSAIN, and HASSAN ALI KHAN filed a Complaint in the above-captioned matter (the
3 “Complaint”);
4
5

WHEREAS, on October 12, 2012, Defendants AT&T MOBILITY LLC and

6 CELCITE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC, (hereinafter referred to collectively as
7 “Defendants”) were served with copies of the Summons and Complaint;
8
9

WHEREAS, pursuant to Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,

10 Defendants are currently required to respond to the Complaint by November 2, 2012;
11

M ILLER L AW G ROUP

A P RO F E SSIO NAL C O RPO RATIO N
C ALIF O RNIA

12

WHEREAS, the parties have STIPULATED to extend the time for Defendants to

13 file their respective responsive pleadings by thirty (30) days in order to allow the parties to
14 explore settlement and to provide Defendants with additional time to investigate the detailed
15 allegations set for in the Complaint in order to submit an informed response;
16
17

WHEREAS, this stipulation does not in any way constitute a responsive

18 pleading by Defendants;
19
20

WHEREAS, no extensions have previously been obtained by the parties as to

21 the particular matter;
22
23 / / /
24 / / /
25 / / /
26 / / /
27 / / /
28 / / /
1
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT - Case No.: C 12-5253 LB

1

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties have STIPULATED that, pursuant to United

2 States District Court, Northern District of California, Local Civil Rule 6-1, Defendants' deadline
3 to file their respective responsive pleadings, as required by Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of
4 Civil Procedure is extended by thirty (30) days and is now December 3, 2012.
5
6

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

7
8 Dated: October

, 2012

VENARDI ZURADA LLP

9
10
By:
11

Mark L. Venardi
Martin Zurada
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
MAHER QADOME, SAQIB HUSSAIN and
HASSAN ALI KHAN

12
~~
~~
o~
ao

13

V~ 6

~U ~
~a o
ae~
~;
and
W~,~
~~
~~
~~

14
15 Dated: October 31 , 2012

MILLER LAW GROUP
A Professional Corporation

16
17
Bv:
18
19

/S/
Donna M. Rutter
Attorneys for Defendant
AT&T MOBILITY LLC

20
21

Dated: October ~,2012

FORD & HARRISON LLP

22
23

i
By:

~'~

~

N

i

Mic elle Ra opo
Attorneys for Defendant
CELCITE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS,
LLC

24
25
26
27
28
2

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF'S
COMPLAINT -Case No.: C 12-5253 LB

1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

2
November 5, 2012
3 Dated: ____________________, 2012

4

____________________________________
JUDGE OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT

5
6

4820-0382-4913, v. 1

7
8
9
10
11

M ILLER L AW G ROUP

A P RO F E SSIO NAL C O RPO RATIO N
C ALIF O RNIA

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT - Case No.: C 12-5253 LB