Johnson et al v. OCZ Technology Group, Inc. et al

Filing 41

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 40 Regarding Extension of Time to Respond to Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/24/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

BORIS FELDMAN, State Bar No. 128838
Email: [e-mail]
CAZ HASHEMI, State Bar No. 210239
Email: [e-mail]
DIANE M. WALTERS, State Bar No. 148136
Email: [e-mail]
NAIRA DER KIUREGHIAN, State Bar No. 282391
Email: [e-mail]
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

8
9

Attorneys for Defendant
OCZ Technology Group, Inc.

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
15

IN RE OCZ TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
SECURITIES LITIGATION

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME
CASE NO. 12-CV-05265-RS

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO.: 12-CV-05265-RS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION
OF TIME TO RESPOND TO
CONSOLIDATED AMENDED CLASS
ACTION COMPLAINT
DATE: N/A
TIME:
N/A
JUDGE: Hon. Richard Seeborg

1

WHEREAS, on March 5, 2013, plaintiffs in the above-captioned action filed a

2

Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint (the “Consolidated Amended Complaint”);

3
4
5
6
7

WHEREAS, pursuant to a stipulation and order entered on January 18, 2013, the deadline
for defendants to respond to the Consolidated Amended Complaint is May 6, 2013;
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to schedule a private mediation on June 27, 2013 to
explore the possibility of a resolution of the above-captioned action;
WHEREAS, in light of the upcoming mediation, defendants have requested that the

8

deadline to respond to the Consolidated Amended Complaint be extended until thirty days after

9

the June 27, 2013 mediation, or until July 29, 2013, and plaintiffs have agreed to defendants’

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

request;
WHEREAS, the requested extension is not for the purpose of delay and will not prejudice
any party;
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the
undersigned, subject to Court approval, as follows:
1.

Defendants shall have until July 29, 2013 to respond to the Consolidated

Amended Complaint.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME
CASE NO. 12-CV-05265-RS

-1-

1

Dated: April 24, 2013

2
3

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

4
5

By: /s/

6
7

Diane M. Walters
Diane M. Walters
[e-mail]

Attorneys for Defendant
OCZ Technology Group, Inc.

8
9

Dated: April 24, 2013

10
11

HOGAN LOVELLS LLP
525 University Avenue 4th Floor
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

12
By: /s/
13

Norman J. Blears
Norman J. Blears
[e-mail]

14
Attorneys for Defendant
Arthur F. Knapp, Jr.

15
16
17

Dated: April 24, 2013

18
19

IRELL & MANELLA LLP
1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

20
By: /s/
21

Daniel P. Lefler
Daniel P. Lefler
[e-mail]

22
Attorneys for Defendant
Ryan M. Petersen

23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME
CASE NO. 12-CV-05265-RS

-2-

1

Dated: April 24, 2013

2
3

LEVI & KORSINSKY LLP
1101 30th Street NW, Suite 115
Washington, DC 20007
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

4
5

By: /s/

6
7

Nicholas I. Porritt
Nicholas I. Porritt
Email: [e-mail]

- and -

8

PUNZALAN LAW, P.C.
600 Allerton Street, Suite 201
Redwood City, CA 94063
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

9
10
11

Attorneys for Lead Plaintiff The OCZ Investor
Group

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME
CASE NO. 12-CV-05265-RS

-3-

1

I, Diane M. Walters, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this

2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME TO

3

RESPOND TO CONSOLIDATED AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT. In

4

compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Norman J. Blears, Daniel P. Lefler,

5

and Nicholas Porritt have concurred in this filing.

6
7

Dated: April 24, 2013

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation

8
9

By: /s/

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME
CASE NO. 12-CV-05265-RS

-4-

Diane M. Walters
Diane M. Walters
[e-mail]

1
2

ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4 DATED: 4/24/13
THE HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME
CASE NO. 12-CV-05265-RS

-5-