Johnson et al v. OCZ Technology Group, Inc. et al

Filing 41

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 40 Regarding Extension of Time to Respond to Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/24/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 BORIS FELDMAN, State Bar No. 128838 Email: boris.feldman@wsgr.com CAZ HASHEMI, State Bar No. 210239 Email: chashemi@wsgr.com DIANE M. WALTERS, State Bar No. 148136 Email: dwalters@wsgr.com NAIRA DER KIUREGHIAN, State Bar No. 282391 Email: ndk@wsgr.com WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 8 9 Attorneys for Defendant OCZ Technology Group, Inc. 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 15 IN RE OCZ TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME CASE NO. 12-CV-05265-RS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 12-CV-05265-RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO CONSOLIDATED AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT DATE: N/A TIME: N/A JUDGE: Hon. Richard Seeborg 1 WHEREAS, on March 5, 2013, plaintiffs in the above-captioned action filed a 2 Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint (the “Consolidated Amended Complaint”); 3 4 5 6 7 WHEREAS, pursuant to a stipulation and order entered on January 18, 2013, the deadline for defendants to respond to the Consolidated Amended Complaint is May 6, 2013; WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to schedule a private mediation on June 27, 2013 to explore the possibility of a resolution of the above-captioned action; WHEREAS, in light of the upcoming mediation, defendants have requested that the 8 deadline to respond to the Consolidated Amended Complaint be extended until thirty days after 9 the June 27, 2013 mediation, or until July 29, 2013, and plaintiffs have agreed to defendants’ 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 request; WHEREAS, the requested extension is not for the purpose of delay and will not prejudice any party; THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned, subject to Court approval, as follows: 1. Defendants shall have until July 29, 2013 to respond to the Consolidated Amended Complaint. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME CASE NO. 12-CV-05265-RS -1- 1 Dated: April 24, 2013 2 3 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 4 5 By: /s/ 6 7 Diane M. Walters Diane M. Walters dwalters@wsgr.com Attorneys for Defendant OCZ Technology Group, Inc. 8 9 Dated: April 24, 2013 10 11 HOGAN LOVELLS LLP 525 University Avenue 4th Floor Palo Alto, CA 94301 Telephone: (650) 463-4000 Facsimile: (650) 463-4199 12 By: /s/ 13 Norman J. Blears Norman J. Blears Norman.blears@hoganlovells.com 14 Attorneys for Defendant Arthur F. Knapp, Jr. 15 16 17 Dated: April 24, 2013 18 19 IRELL & MANELLA LLP 1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (310) 277-1010 Facsimile: (310) 203-7199 20 By: /s/ 21 Daniel P. Lefler Daniel P. Lefler DLefler@irell.com 22 Attorneys for Defendant Ryan M. Petersen 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME CASE NO. 12-CV-05265-RS -2- 1 Dated: April 24, 2013 2 3 LEVI & KORSINSKY LLP 1101 30th Street NW, Suite 115 Washington, DC 20007 Telephone: (202) 524-4290 Facsimile: (202) 337-1567 4 5 By: /s/ 6 7 Nicholas I. Porritt Nicholas I. Porritt Email: nporritt@zlk.com - and - 8 PUNZALAN LAW, P.C. 600 Allerton Street, Suite 201 Redwood City, CA 94063 Telephone: (650) 362-4150 Facsimile: (650) 362-4151 9 10 11 Attorneys for Lead Plaintiff The OCZ Investor Group 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME CASE NO. 12-CV-05265-RS -3- 1 I, Diane M. Walters, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME TO 3 RESPOND TO CONSOLIDATED AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT. In 4 compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Norman J. Blears, Daniel P. Lefler, 5 and Nicholas Porritt have concurred in this filing. 6 7 Dated: April 24, 2013 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 8 9 By: /s/ 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME CASE NO. 12-CV-05265-RS -4- Diane M. Walters Diane M. Walters dwalters@wsgr.com 1 2 ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 DATED: 4/24/13 THE HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME CASE NO. 12-CV-05265-RS -5-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?