Lancaster v. City of Pleasanton et al

Filing 86

Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu denying 80 Motion to Continue. The motion to continue the settlement conference is DENIED. The settlement conference will remain scheduled for June 14, 2013 at 11 a.m. However, the subject matter of the settlement conference shall be restricted to Plaintiffsfederal claim against Defendant Officer Tim Martens. No other parties besides Plaintiff and Defendant Martens shall appear.(dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

BRIAN LANCASTER,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

Plaintiff(s),
v.

12

CITY OF PLEASANTON,

13

No. C-12-05267 DMR
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO CONTINUE
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND
LIMITING SUBJECT MATTER OF
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

Defendant(s).
___________________________________/

14
15

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:

16

The court is in receipt of the Defendants’ administrative motion to continue the settlement

17

conference. [Docket No. 80.] The motion to continue the settlement conference is DENIED. The

18

settlement conference will remain scheduled for June 14, 2013 at 11 a.m.

19

However, the subject matter of the settlement conference shall be restricted to Plaintiff’s

20

federal claim against Defendant Officer Tim Martens. No other parties besides Plaintiff and

21

Defendant Martens shall appear.

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25

Dated: June 3, 2013

26
27
28

DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge