Shelton v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Filing
23
ORDER GRANTING 22 STIPULATION selecting Mediation. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 1/3/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2013)
Case3:12-cv-05269-JSW Document22 Filed12/28/12 Page1 of 2
MICHELLE L. ROBERTS (SBN: 239092)
CASSIE SPRINGER-SULLIVAN (SBN:
221506)
SPRINGER-SULLIVAN & ROBERTS LLP
410 – 12th Street, Suite 325
Oakland, CA 94607
Telephone:
(510) 992-6130
Facsimile:
(510) 280-7564
Email: mlr@ssrlawgroup.com
css@ssrlawgroup.com
PAMELA E. COGAN (SBN 105089)
TINO XUAN DO (SBN 221346)
ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY
1001 Marshall Street, Suite 500
Redwood City, CA 94063-2052
Telephone: (650) 364-8200
Facsimile: (650) 780-1701
Email: pcogan@rmkb.com
tdo@rmkb.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
AUSTIN SHELTON
Attorneys for Defendant
LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE
COMPANY OF
BOSTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Austin Shelton,
CASE NO. Case No. C12-5269 JSW
Plaintiff,
v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston,
Defendant.
_______________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
☐
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
☐
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
x
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
☐
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
Case3:12-cv-05269-JSW Document22 Filed12/28/12 Page2 of 2
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
x
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
☐
other requested deadline _____________________________________________
Dated: December 28, 2013
/s/Michelle L. Roberts
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: December 28, 2013
/s/Tino Xuan Do
Attorney for Defendant
[PROPOSED] ORDER
☐
☐
Dated:
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
January 3, 2013
__________________________________
Honorable Jeffrey S. White
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”
Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?